Msiza and Another v South African Local Government Bargaining Council and Others (JR1263/12) [2015] ZALCJHB 133 (22 April 2015)
The court found that the applicants had entered into fixed-term contracts with the third respondent and subsequently, despite a collective agreement providing for conversion to permanent positions, expressly waived their rights under that agreement. The arbitrator's decision that the applicants were not dismissed but that their contracts had expired was reasonable and supported by the evidence. The failure to consider closing statements before issuing the award did not amount to a material irregularity sufficient to vitiate the award. The application for review was therefore dismissed, and condonation for late filing was granted.
- Citation
- [2015] ZALCJHB 133
- Parties
- Applicant: Jan Charly Msiza; Applicant: Boy Mgiji Skosana; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council; Respondent: Commissioner Thomas NtimBana; Respondent: Thembisile Hani Local Municipality
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2015
- Case Number
- JR1263/12
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed; condonation for late filing granted; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Mthombeni
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Term Contracts, Collective Agreements, Waiver of Rights, Unfair Dismissal, Condonation, Arbitration Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jan Charly Msiza
Applicant
Boy Mgiji Skosana
Applicant
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Commissioner Thomas NtimBana
Respondent
Thembisile Hani Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the applicants' fixed-term contracts constituted a dismissal under the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the applicants waived their rights under the collective agreement to convert their positions to permanent employment.
- 3 Whether the arbitration award was reviewable due to alleged irregularities, including the timing of closing statements.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had entered into fixed-term contracts with the third respondent and subsequently, despite a collective agreement providing for conversion to permanent positions, expressly waived their rights under that agreement. The arbitrator's decision that the applicants were not dismissed but that their contracts had expired was reasonable and supported by the evidence. The failure to consider closing statements before issuing the award did not amount to a material irregularity sufficient to vitiate the award. The application for review was therefore dismissed, and condonation for late filing was granted.
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed; condonation for late filing granted; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Condonation for the late filing of this application is granted.
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment