Mtini v Kagiso Khulani Supervision Food Services (J1401/97) [2001] ZALC 129 (20 August 2001)

Mtini v Kagiso Khulani Supervision Food Services (J1401/97) [2001] ZALC 129 (20 August 2001)

The court found that the applicant failed to make any submissions establishing jurisdiction for the Labour Court to overturn the previous judgment of Grogan AJ. The applicant's refusal to address the jurisdictional issue and his repeated filing of defective applications were deemed vexatious. The court held that the correct forum for seeking leave to appeal is the Labour Appeal Court, not the Labour Court. Consequently, leave to appeal was refused and a punitive costs order was made against the applicant.

Citation
[2001] ZALC 129
Parties
Applicant: A Mtini; Respondent: Kagiso Khulani Supervision Food Services
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 August 2001
Case Number
J1401/97
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal is refused. The applicant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs on an attorney and own client scale.
Judges
E Revelas
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Jurisdiction, Vexatious Litigation, Costs Award
Labour Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Jurisdiction Vexatious Litigation Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A Mtini

Applicant

Kagiso Khulani Supervision Food Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has made submissions establishing jurisdiction for this court to overturn a previous judgment.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted to the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's conduct in litigation is vexatious.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to make any submissions establishing jurisdiction for the Labour Court to overturn the previous judgment of Grogan AJ. The applicant's refusal to address the jurisdictional issue and his repeated filing of defective applications were deemed vexatious. The court held that the correct forum for seeking leave to appeal is the Labour Appeal Court, not the Labour Court. Consequently, leave to appeal was refused and a punitive costs order was made against the applicant.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is refused. The applicant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs on an attorney and own client scale.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is refused.
  • The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs on an attorney and own client scale.