Mtungwa and Another v Premier of Kwazulu-Natal and Others (3618/22P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 19 (28 February 2023)
The court found that the method of succession to the position of iNkosi within the traditional community was correctly applied, following the male line through the eldest son and his male progeny. The applicants' contention that the youngest son should succeed was rejected as inconsistent with the established method of succession. The court held that there was no reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different decision, nor were there any compelling reasons to grant leave to appeal. The application for leave to appeal was therefore dismissed with costs, including the costs of senior counsel.
- Citation
- [2023] ZAKZPHC 19
- Parties
- Applicant: Mfaniseni Mboniseni Mtungwa; Applicant: Members of Umndeni Wenkosi listed in Annexure 'A'; Respondent: Premier of Kwazulu-Natal; Respondent: Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Kwazulu-Natal; Respondent: Thokozani Mtungwa
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2023
- Case Number
- 3618/22P
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Review Application
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including the costs of senior counsel.
- Judges
- Mossop
- Legal Topics
- Traditional Leadership Succession, Review of Administrative Action, Leave to Appeal, Kwazulu Natal Traditional Leadership and Governance Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mfaniseni Mboniseni Mtungwa
Applicant
Members of Umndeni Wenkosi listed in Annexure 'A'
Applicant
Premier of Kwazulu-Natal
Respondent
Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Kwazulu-Natal
Respondent
Thokozani Mtungwa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different decision regarding the recognition of the third respondent as iNkosi of the Mabaso clan.
- 2 Whether the method of succession to the position of iNkosi was correctly applied.
- 3 Whether there are compelling reasons justifying leave to appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the method of succession to the position of iNkosi within the traditional community was correctly applied, following the male line through the eldest son and his male progeny. The applicants' contention that the youngest son should succeed was rejected as inconsistent with the established method of succession. The court held that there was no reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different decision, nor were there any compelling reasons to grant leave to appeal. The application for leave to appeal was therefore dismissed with costs, including the costs of senior counsel.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including the costs of senior counsel.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is refused with costs, such to include the costs of senior counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment