Multi-links Telecommunications Ltd v Africa Prepaid Services Nigeria Ltd (35347/13, 30004/13) [2013] ZAGPPHC 261; [2013] 4 All SA 346 (GNP); 2014 (3) SA 265 (GP) (6 September 2013)

Multi-links Telecommunications Ltd v Africa Prepaid Services Nigeria Ltd (35347/13, 30004/13) [2013] ZAGPPHC 261; [2013] 4 All SA 346 (GNP); 2014 (3) SA 265 (GP) (6 September 2013)

The court held that, although APSN is a foreign peregrinus, the North Gauteng High Court may exercise jurisdiction based on sufficient connecting factors, appropriateness, and convenience, as developed in Strang and subsequent case law. The arbitration agreement specified South African law and venue, APSN's principal agent was domiciled in the jurisdiction, and most relevant events and parties were connected to South Africa. The court found that Multi-Links and Telkom had raised a triable issue regarding jurisdiction and that the question should be finally determined by the trial court, not at the interlocutory stage. The application by APSN to have the court declare lack of jurisdiction...

Citation
[2013] ZAGPPHC 261
Parties
Applicant: Multi-Links Telecommunications Ltd; Respondent: Africa Prepaid Services Nigeria Ltd; Plaintiff: Telkom SA SOC Limited; Plaintiff: Multi-Links Telecommunications Limited; Defendant: Blue Label Telecoms Limited; Defendant: Africa Prepaid Services (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Africa Prepaid Services Nigeria Limited; Defendant: Mark Pamensky; Defendant: Perry-Mason Mthunzi Ndwaba; Defendant: Thamsanqa (Thami) Goodenough Msimango
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
6 September 2013
Case Number
35347/13; 30004/13
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Interlocutory Applications Regarding Jurisdiction and Stay of Arbitration
Outcome
Application by APSN to declare lack of jurisdiction dismissed with costs; stay application under section 3(2) of the Arbitration Act granted; costs of attachment application awarded against Telkom and Multi-Links on attorney and client scale.
Judges
Fabricius
Legal Topics
Forum Conveniens, Arbitration Agreement, Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants, Attachment to Found Jurisdiction, Continentia Causae, Misrepresentation
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Forum Conveniens Arbitration Agreement Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants Attachment to Found Jurisdiction Continentia Causae Misrepresentation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 34 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Multi-Links Telecommunications Ltd

Applicant

Africa Prepaid Services Nigeria Ltd

Respondent

Telkom SA SOC Limited

Plaintiff

Multi-Links Telecommunications Limited

Plaintiff

Blue Label Telecoms Limited

Defendant

Africa Prepaid Services (Pty) Ltd

Defendant

Africa Prepaid Services Nigeria Limited

Defendant

Mark Pamensky

Defendant

Perry-Mason Mthunzi Ndwaba

Defendant

Thamsanqa (Thami) Goodenough Msimango

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Interlocutory Applications Regarding Jurisdiction and Stay of Arbitration

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the North Gauteng High Court has jurisdiction over Africa Prepaid Services Nigeria Limited (APSN), a foreign peregrinus.
  2. 2 Whether good cause exists to set aside the arbitration agreement under section 3(2) of the Arbitration Act 42 of 1965.
  3. 3 Whether APSN is a necessary party to the litigation and whether the court should exercise jurisdiction based on appropriateness and convenience.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, although APSN is a foreign peregrinus, the North Gauteng High Court may exercise jurisdiction based on sufficient connecting factors, appropriateness, and convenience, as developed in Strang and subsequent case law. The arbitration agreement specified South African law and venue, APSN's principal agent was domiciled in the jurisdiction, and most relevant events and parties were connected to South Africa. The court found that Multi-Links and Telkom had raised a triable issue regarding jurisdiction and that the question should be finally determined by the trial court, not at the interlocutory stage. The application by APSN to have the court declare lack of jurisdiction...

Court Disposition

Application by APSN to declare lack of jurisdiction dismissed with costs; stay application under section 3(2) of the Arbitration Act granted; costs of attachment application awarded against Telkom and Multi-Links on attorney and client scale.

Orders

  • The application by Africa Prepaid Services Nigeria Limited to declare lack of jurisdiction is dismissed with costs, including costs of three counsel.
  • An order is granted in terms of prayers 1 and 3 of the notice of motion under case 35347/2013, with costs including costs of three counsel.