Museler N.O v Momberg N.O and Others (617/2022) [2025] ZAECMKHC 29 (18 March 2025)

Museler N.O v Momberg N.O and Others (617/2022) [2025] ZAECMKHC 29 (18 March 2025)

The court found that the applicant failed to establish that the respondent’s conduct imperiled the trust property or its proper administration. The trust continued to function, and the respondent contributed to its management and upkeep. The breakdown in the relationship and isolated incidents of questionable conduct did not meet the threshold for removal under section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act. The court emphasized that the decisive consideration is the welfare of the beneficiaries and proper administration of the trust, and that mere disharmony or historical incidents are insufficient. The court also noted that alternative dispute resolution and intervention by the Master...

Citation
[2025] ZAECMKHC 29
Parties
Applicant: Lucinda Wynne Museler N.O.; Respondent: Shannon Lee Momberg N.O.; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Makhanda; Respondent: Martin Museler; Respondent: Chynee Elizabeth Minnie; Respondent: Chad Alexander Momberg; Respondent: Siobhan Helen Momberg
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
18 March 2025
Case Number
617/2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment on Application for Removal of Trustee
Outcome
Application dismissed. Applicant to pay 50% of first respondent’s costs in her personal capacity. Master directed to reconsider appointment of trustee under section 7 of the Act.
Judges
Govindjee
Legal Topics
Trustee Removal, Trust Property Control Act, Fiduciary Duties, Deadlock in Trusteeship, Costs Award
Land and Property Civil Procedure Trustee Removal Trust Property Control Act Fiduciary Duties Deadlock in Trusteeship Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lucinda Wynne Museler N.O.

Applicant

Shannon Lee Momberg N.O.

Respondent

The Master of the High Court, Makhanda

Respondent

Martin Museler

Respondent

Chynee Elizabeth Minnie

Respondent

Chad Alexander Momberg

Respondent

Siobhan Helen Momberg

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Judgment on Application for Removal of Trustee

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the first respondent should be removed as trustee of the Wynhelee Trust under section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act, 1988.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's conduct imperils the trust property or its proper administration.
  3. 3 Whether the breakdown in relationship between trustees justifies removal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to establish that the respondent’s conduct imperiled the trust property or its proper administration. The trust continued to function, and the respondent contributed to its management and upkeep. The breakdown in the relationship and isolated incidents of questionable conduct did not meet the threshold for removal under section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act. The court emphasized that the decisive consideration is the welfare of the beneficiaries and proper administration of the trust, and that mere disharmony or historical incidents are insufficient. The court also noted that alternative dispute resolution and intervention by the Master...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed. Applicant to pay 50% of first respondent’s costs in her personal capacity. Master directed to reconsider appointment of trustee under section 7 of the Act.

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • The applicant shall, in her personal capacity, pay 50% of the first respondent’s costs of the application on a party and party scale.