Myaka and Others v S (A5040/2011, 215/2005) [2012] ZAGPJHC 174 (21 September 2012)

Myaka and Others v S (A5040/2011, 215/2005) [2012] ZAGPJHC 174 (21 September 2012)

The appeal court found that the reconstructed record was adequate for adjudication, as no specific deficiencies were identified. The admission statements by appellants one and two were properly admitted, as the trial judge found the police evidence credible and the statements, though exculpatory, placed the appellants at the scene and were not likely to have been fabricated by police. The identification evidence of Shonisele Dube was reliable, corroborated by ballistic evidence and the statements of the appellants. The court found that all three appellants were involved in a conspiracy to commit murder, with second appellant's conduct and statement confirming his participation in the...

Citation
[2012] ZAGPJHC 174
Parties
Appellant: Myaka, Disco C; Appellant: Mahlabane, Lungisani D; Appellant: Ndlovu, Sifaneleyana E; Respondent: The State
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 September 2012
Case Number
A5040/2011, 215/2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Full Bench Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeals against all convictions and sentences dismissed.
Judges
Satchwell, Claassen
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Evidence, Single Witness Identification, Common Purpose, Delay in Judgment, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Admissibility of Evidence Single Witness Identification Common Purpose Delay in Judgment Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Myaka, Disco C

Appellant

Mahlabane, Lungisani D

Appellant

Ndlovu, Sifaneleyana E

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Full Bench Appeal From Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the reconstructed trial record was sufficient for a fair appeal hearing.
  2. 2 Whether the admission statements by appellants one and two were properly admitted into evidence.
  3. 3 Whether the identification evidence of the single witness was reliable.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal court found that the reconstructed record was adequate for adjudication, as no specific deficiencies were identified. The admission statements by appellants one and two were properly admitted, as the trial judge found the police evidence credible and the statements, though exculpatory, placed the appellants at the scene and were not likely to have been fabricated by police. The identification evidence of Shonisele Dube was reliable, corroborated by ballistic evidence and the statements of the appellants. The court found that all three appellants were involved in a conspiracy to commit murder, with second appellant's conduct and statement confirming his participation in the...

Court Disposition

Appeals against all convictions and sentences dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeals against all the convictions and sentences are dismissed.