Nafcoc (Limpopo) and Others v Kgolane and Others (35826/2011) [2015] ZAGPPHC 1013 (31 July 2015)
The court found that the meeting of 21 April 2011 was not properly constituted as an electoral meeting, and no valid notice was given for the election of office bearers, rendering the resolutions and elections at that meeting ultra vires the applicable 2008 Constitution of NAFCOC (Limpopo) and thus null and void. The purported termination of the First, Second and Third Respondents' membership was also invalid as the prescribed procedures under the 2008 Constitution were not followed. The moratorium on elections imposed by NAFCOC (National) was declared invalid, as the constitution did not confer such power. The court held that all necessary parties with a direct and substantial interest...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 1013
- Parties
- Applicant: NAFCOC (Limpopo); Applicant: Izaac Masekwameng; Applicant: SG Mosena; Applicant: HK Makgae; Applicant: MR Shai; Applicant: A Monakedi; Applicant: R Livhoyi; Applicant: Mpho Mogale; Respondent: Sello Mahlagaume Kgolane; Respondent: Themba Maluleke; Respondent: Noah Serage; Respondent: NAFCOC (National); Respondent: Lawrence Mavundla
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2015
- Case Number
- 35826/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Main Application and Counter Application; Rule Nisi Issued
- Outcome
- Rule nisi issued with interim interdict; declaratory and interdictory relief granted subject to return date; no costs order.
- Judges
- J Louw
- Legal Topics
- Non Joinder, Ultra Vires, Interdict, Corporate Governance, Constitutional Compliance, Termination of Membership
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NAFCOC (Limpopo)
Applicant
Izaac Masekwameng
Applicant
SG Mosena
Applicant
HK Makgae
Applicant
MR Shai
Applicant
A Monakedi
Applicant
R Livhoyi
Applicant
Mpho Mogale
Applicant
Sello Mahlagaume Kgolane
Respondent
Themba Maluleke
Respondent
Noah Serage
Respondent
NAFCOC (National)
Respondent
Lawrence Mavundla
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Main Application and Counter Application; Rule Nisi Issued
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the election of office bearers on 21 April 2011 was valid under the applicable constitution.
- 2 Whether the termination of the First, Second and Third Respondents' membership was procedurally and constitutionally valid.
- 3 Whether all necessary parties were joined in the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the meeting of 21 April 2011 was not properly constituted as an electoral meeting, and no valid notice was given for the election of office bearers, rendering the resolutions and elections at that meeting ultra vires the applicable 2008 Constitution of NAFCOC (Limpopo) and thus null and void. The purported termination of the First, Second and Third Respondents' membership was also invalid as the prescribed procedures under the 2008 Constitution were not followed. The moratorium on elections imposed by NAFCOC (National) was declared invalid, as the constitution did not confer such power. The court held that all necessary parties with a direct and substantial interest...
Court Disposition
Rule nisi issued with interim interdict; declaratory and interdictory relief granted subject to return date; no costs order.
Orders
- A rule nisi with return date 3 November 2015 is issued, calling upon all interested persons and in particular the persons purportedly elected as executive committee members of the First Respondent on 21 April 2011 to show cause why the following orders should not be made:
- It is declared that the purported election of office bearers (including First, Second and Third Respondents) on 21 April 2011 is ultra vires the then applicable Constitution of the First Applicant, being the 2008 Constitution, and as such is null and void.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment