Nakedi and Another v Jacobs N.O. and Another- Application for Leave to Appeal (4648/2023) [2024] ZAFSHC 115 (22 April 2024)
The court found that the applicants failed to raise any new or compelling grounds that would justify granting leave to appeal. The issues raised in the application for leave to appeal had already been fully addressed in the original judgment, and the applicants did not demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The liquidator's decision not to oppose the application was deemed irrelevant to the merits. The court concluded that there was no basis for another court to reach a different conclusion and no compelling reason for the matter to be heard by a court of appeal. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused.
- Citation
- [2024] ZAFSHC 115
- Parties
- Applicant: Nathane Soulman Nakedi; Applicant: Any Further Unlawful Occupiers of Unit 23 Thora's Place, Van Blerk Street Sterling Small Holdings, District Bloemfontein, Free State Province; Respondent: Welcome Norman Jacobs N.O. (in his capacity as the liquidator of Two Fine Commodities (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation)); Respondent: Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2024
- Case Number
- 4648/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Eviction Order
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- JP Daffue
- Legal Topics
- Eviction Proceedings, Leave to Appeal, Liquidation and Winding Up
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nathane Soulman Nakedi
Applicant
Any Further Unlawful Occupiers of Unit 23 Thora's Place, Van Blerk Street Sterling Small Holdings, District Bloemfontein, Free State Province
Applicant
Welcome Norman Jacobs N.O. (in his capacity as the liquidator of Two Fine Commodities (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation))
Respondent
Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Eviction Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have reasonable prospects of success on appeal against the eviction order.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons for the matter to be heard by a court of appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to raise any new or compelling grounds that would justify granting leave to appeal. The issues raised in the application for leave to appeal had already been fully addressed in the original judgment, and the applicants did not demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The liquidator's decision not to oppose the application was deemed irrelevant to the merits. The court concluded that there was no basis for another court to reach a different conclusion and no compelling reason for the matter to be heard by a court of appeal. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment