Natal Rugby Union v Gould (173/96) [1998] ZASCA 62; 1999 (1) SA 432 (SCA); [1998] 4 All SA 258 (A) (10 September 1998)

Natal Rugby Union v Gould (173/96) [1998] ZASCA 62; 1999 (1) SA 432 (SCA); [1998] 4 All SA 258 (A) (10 September 1998)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the constitution of the Natal Rugby Union required the president to act as chairman of all meetings unless physically absent. There was no constitutional provision disqualifying the president from chairing the meeting due to personal interest in the election outcome. The alleged irregularity of Van Zyl acting as chairman was not supported by the evidence, as Parkinson remained chairman throughout. The voting procedure by secret ballot was not irregular, as the constitution did not mandate voting by show of hands at general meetings, and the chairman was entitled to choose the method in the absence of objection. The Union's decision to hold a...

Citation
[1998] ZASCA 62
Parties
Appellant: Natal Rugby Union; Respondent: Rodney Lloyd Gould
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 September 1998
Case Number
173/96
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Review Application in the Natal Provincial Division
Outcome
Appeal allowed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Judges
Howie, Harms, Zulman, Plewman, Melunsky
Legal Topics
Voluntary Association Governance, Contractual Interpretation, Chairman Disqualification, Election Procedure
Commercial and Corporate Voluntary Association Governance Contractual Interpretation Chairman Disqualification Election Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Natal Rugby Union

Appellant

Rodney Lloyd Gould

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Review Application in the Natal Provincial Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the decision electing Parkinson as president was invalidated by procedural irregularities regarding chairmanship and voting method.
  2. 2 Whether the right to appeal was perempted by the Union's compliance with the order.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal should be entertained if the only issue concerns costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the constitution of the Natal Rugby Union required the president to act as chairman of all meetings unless physically absent. There was no constitutional provision disqualifying the president from chairing the meeting due to personal interest in the election outcome. The alleged irregularity of Van Zyl acting as chairman was not supported by the evidence, as Parkinson remained chairman throughout. The voting procedure by secret ballot was not irregular, as the constitution did not mandate voting by show of hands at general meetings, and the chairman was entitled to choose the method in the absence of objection. The Union's decision to hold a...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed with costs, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
  • The order of the Court a quo is set aside and substituted with: 'The application is dismissed with costs, such costs to include the costs of two counsel.'