National Arts Council and Another v Minister of Arts and Culture and Another (10838/04 , 807/05) [2005] ZAWCHC 49; 2006 (1) SA 215 (C) [2006] 3 All SA 395 (C) (15 July 2005)

National Arts Council and Another v Minister of Arts and Culture and Another (10838/04 , 807/05) [2005] ZAWCHC 49; 2006 (1) SA 215 (C) [2006] 3 All SA 395 (C) (15 July 2005)

The court found that the decision to dissolve the National Arts Council was made in Pretoria, not Cape Town, and therefore the Western Cape High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear both the urgent application and the review proceedings. The applicants failed to prove that the respondents had submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, either expressly or by conduct. The respondents' participation in procedural agreements and postponements did not amount to waiver or acquiescence, as they consistently reserved their right to contest jurisdiction. Consequently, the applicants did not overcome the jurisdictional hurdle, and the application was dismissed without consideration of the substantive...

Citation
[2005] ZAWCHC 49
Parties
Applicant: National Arts Council; Respondent: Minister of Arts and Culture
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
15 July 2005
Case Number
10838/04 , 807/05
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment on Jurisdictional Challenge
Outcome
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Judges
N J Yekiso
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of High Court, Submission to Jurisdiction, Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Judicial Review
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of High Court Submission to Jurisdiction Promotion of Administrative Justice Act Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Arts Council

Applicant

Minister of Arts and Culture

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Final Judgment on Jurisdictional Challenge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Western Cape High Court has jurisdiction to hear the application for urgent relief and judicial review of the Minister's decision.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents submitted to the jurisdiction of the court by conduct or agreement.
  3. 3 Whether the decision to dissolve the National Arts Council was taken within the jurisdiction of the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the decision to dissolve the National Arts Council was made in Pretoria, not Cape Town, and therefore the Western Cape High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear both the urgent application and the review proceedings. The applicants failed to prove that the respondents had submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, either expressly or by conduct. The respondents' participation in procedural agreements and postponements did not amount to waiver or acquiescence, as they consistently reserved their right to contest jurisdiction. Consequently, the applicants did not overcome the jurisdictional hurdle, and the application was dismissed without consideration of the substantive...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs, including costs consequent upon employment of two counsel.
  • First and second applicants are ordered to pay the costs of these proceedings, jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved.