National Council of and for persons with disabilities v Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (49918/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 443 (30 April 2024)

National Council of and for persons with disabilities v Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (49918/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 443 (30 April 2024)

The court found that it is reasonably arguable that the learned judge erred in finding that there was unreasonable delay and that the applicant had not established a good case on the merits. Given the prospects of success and the importance of the rights at issue, the court held that leave to appeal to the Supreme...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] ZAGPPHC 443
Parties
Applicant: National Council of and for persons with disabilities; Respondent: Independent Communications Authority of South Africa
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
49918/2021
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Judgment of Tolmay J
Outcome
Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is granted.
Judges
Tuchten
Legal Topics
Unreasonable Delay, Leave to Appeal, Merits Review
Administrative Law Unreasonable Delay Leave to Appeal Merits Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Council of and for persons with disabilities

Applicant

Independent Communications Authority of South Africa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Judgment of Tolmay J

  1. 1 Whether the applicant delayed unreasonably in bringing the application.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant established a good case on the merits for appeal.
  3. 3 Whether leave to appeal should be granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that it is reasonably arguable that the learned judge erred in finding that there was unreasonable delay and that the applicant had not established a good case on the merits. Given the prospects of success and the importance of the rights at issue, the court held that leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal should be granted.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is granted.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal.
  • The costs of the application for leave to appeal will stand over, pending the decision on appeal.