National Credit Regulator v Access a Loan (Pty) Ltd (NCT/266951/2023/140(1)) [2024] ZANCT 3 (12 February 2024)
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by operating as a credit provider after its registration had lapsed, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, charging unlawful VAT and excessive service fees, inducing consumers to enter into unlawful supplementary agreements, and failing to submit required statutory returns. The respondent's conduct constituted prohibited conduct and reckless lending. The Tribunal declared the respondent's credit agreements with consumers in the sampled files as reckless, set aside the consumers' rights and obligations under those agreements, ordered refunds of unlawful charges, interdicting future...
- Citation
- [2024] ZANCT 3
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Access a Loan (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2024
- Case Number
- NCT/266951/2023/140(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The respondent is found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act, committed prohibited conduct, and entered into reckless credit agreements. Remedial orders and an administrative fine are imposed.
- Judges
- S Mbhele, A Potwana, C.J Ntsoane
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Credit Provider Registration, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Prohibited Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Access a Loan (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent contravened the National Credit Act by operating as an unregistered credit provider.
- 2 Whether the respondent failed to conduct proper affordability assessments and maintain required records.
- 3 Whether the respondent charged unlawful VAT and excessive service fees.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by operating as a credit provider after its registration had lapsed, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, charging unlawful VAT and excessive service fees, inducing consumers to enter into unlawful supplementary agreements, and failing to submit required statutory returns. The respondent's conduct constituted prohibited conduct and reckless lending. The Tribunal declared the respondent's credit agreements with consumers in the sampled files as reckless, set aside the consumers' rights and obligations under those agreements, ordered refunds of unlawful charges, interdicting future...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The respondent is found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act, committed prohibited conduct, and entered into reckless credit agreements. Remedial orders and an administrative fine are imposed.
Orders
- The respondent is declared to have repeatedly contravened specified sections and regulations of the National Credit Act.
- The respondent's credit agreements with consumers in annexures G1 to G10 are declared reckless; consumers' rights and obligations under those agreements are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment