National Credit Regulator v Adberof and Another (NCT/17833/2014/140(1)) [2015] ZANCT 37 (14 August 2015)
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the First Respondent repeatedly failed to comply with statutory requirements under the National Credit Act, including submission of prescribed forms, conducting over-indebtedness determinations, and referring matters for debt restructuring. The First Respondent unlawfully received consumer payments intended for credit providers and failed to distribute these funds as required. The explanations offered by the First Respondent were unconvincing and did not absolve her of responsibility. The Tribunal held that these actions constituted prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the Act. While the Applicant sought an administrative...
- Citation
- [2015] ZANCT 37
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Yasmina Adberof; Respondent: Sieraj Adberof
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2015
- Case Number
- NCT/17833/2014/140(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Final Determination
- Outcome
- The application is granted in part. The First Respondent is found to have engaged in prohibited conduct under the National Credit Act and is ordered to refund all clients for amounts paid for credit provider payments, compile and submit a list of affected clients, use best efforts to locate clients, report on...
- Judges
- Tanya Woker, Joe Maseko, John Simpson
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Debt Counselling, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Penalty, Refund Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Yasmina Adberof
Respondent
Sieraj Adberof
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First Respondent engaged in prohibited conduct under the National Credit Act by failing to comply with statutory and registration requirements.
- 2 Whether the First Respondent unlawfully received and failed to distribute consumer funds intended for credit providers.
- 3 Whether the Tribunal is empowered to order refunds to consumers for amounts paid to the debt counsellor but not distributed to credit providers.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the First Respondent repeatedly failed to comply with statutory requirements under the National Credit Act, including submission of prescribed forms, conducting over-indebtedness determinations, and referring matters for debt restructuring. The First Respondent unlawfully received consumer payments intended for credit providers and failed to distribute these funds as required. The explanations offered by the First Respondent were unconvincing and did not absolve her of responsibility. The Tribunal held that these actions constituted prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the Act. While the Applicant sought an administrative...
Court Disposition
The application is granted in part. The First Respondent is found to have engaged in prohibited conduct under the National Credit Act and is ordered to refund all clients for amounts paid for credit provider payments, compile and submit a list of affected clients, use best efforts to locate clients, report on...
Orders
- The First Respondent must compile a list of all clients who paid money to Debt Out or Tamzin and supply such list to the Applicant within 30 days.
- The First Respondent must refund all clients all amounts paid by them in order to pay credit providers, with refunds to be made within 90 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment