National Credit Regulator v Aristoscan CC t/a JMK Cash Loans (NCT/128380/2019/140(1)) [2019] ZANCT 103 (1 July 2019)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by extending credit while unregistered, failing to conduct affordability assessments, charging excessive interest rates, retaining consumer bank and SASSA cards and PINs as security, and failing to provide required pre-agreement disclosures and credit agreements in the prescribed format. The Respondent's conduct was ongoing and serious, affecting vulnerable consumers and resulting in financial loss and privacy violations. The Tribunal held that the requirements for a default judgment were met, as the Respondent was properly served and failed to respond. Given the gravity and extent of the contraventions,...
- Citation
- [2019] ZANCT 103
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Aristoscan CC t/a JMK Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 July 2019
- Case Number
- NCT/128380/2019/140(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; Respondent found to have engaged in prohibited conduct and ordered to pay an administrative fine and appoint an auditor for consumer refunds.
- Judges
- M. Nkomo, P. Beck, M. Peenze
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Fine, Affordability Assessment, Unregistered Credit Provider, Excessive Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Aristoscan CC t/a JMK Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent engaged in prohibited conduct by repeatedly contravening the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether the Respondent extended credit while unregistered as a credit provider.
- 3 Whether the Respondent failed to conduct proper affordability assessments.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by extending credit while unregistered, failing to conduct affordability assessments, charging excessive interest rates, retaining consumer bank and SASSA cards and PINs as security, and failing to provide required pre-agreement disclosures and credit agreements in the prescribed format. The Respondent's conduct was ongoing and serious, affecting vulnerable consumers and resulting in financial loss and privacy violations. The Tribunal held that the requirements for a default judgment were met, as the Respondent was properly served and failed to respond. Given the gravity and extent of the contraventions,...
Court Disposition
Application granted; Respondent found to have engaged in prohibited conduct and ordered to pay an administrative fine and appoint an auditor for consumer refunds.
Orders
- The Respondent is declared to have engaged in prohibited conduct by contravening sections 40(3), 81(2), 81(3), 133(1) and (2), 100(1)(c), 101(1)(c) and (d)(ii), 92, and 93(2) of the National Credit Act.
- The Respondent is interdicted and refrained from further contraventions of the Act as outlined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment