National Credit Regulator v Cilliers (NCT/78394/2017/57(1)) [2019] ZANCT 100 (28 June 2019)
- Citation
- [2019] ZANCT 100
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Panel
- B Dumisa, A Potwana, J Simpson
- Case number
- NCT/78394/2017/57(1)
More details
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Panel
- B Dumisa, A Potwana, J Simpson
- Case number
- NCT/78394/2017/57(1)
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal determined that postponing the matter sine die was appropriate to allow the parties to finalize settlement negotiations. Clear procedural directions were provided: if the parties settle and wish the agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application must be filed by 26 July 2019; if they settle but do not wish for an order, a notice of withdrawal must be filed by the same date. Failure to comply will result in the matter being set down for hearing. No order as to costs was made, reflecting the Tribunal's neutral stance pending the outcome of negotiations.
Court disposition
The matter is postponed sine die to allow settlement negotiations. Procedural steps for settlement or withdrawal are stipulated, with a deadline of 26 July 2019. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The matter is postponed sine die to allow the parties to finalize settlement negotiations.
- If the parties settle and wish the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application must be filed on or before 26 July 2019.
- If the parties settle and do not wish the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, the Applicant must file a notice of withdrawal on or before 26 July 2019.
- If neither an application to confirm the settlement agreement nor a notice of withdrawal is submitted by 26 July 2019, the Registrar will set the matter down for hearing.
- No order is made as to costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant Counsel: Ms Rushni Venugopal and Ms Leanne SchwartzEugene Barnard Cilliers
Respondent Counsel: Van Zyl H.C03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Application / Postponement Order
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the matter should be postponed to allow parties to pursue settlement negotiations.
- 02
What procedural steps must be followed if the parties reach settlement or wish to withdraw the application.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Applicant indicated willingness to settle and agreed to postpone proceedings to allow further negotiations. The Applicant sought clarity on which allegations remained disputed and was open to confirming a settlement agreement as an order of the Tribunal or withdrawing the application, depending on the outcome of negotiations.
- Respondent
- The Respondent, through Advocate Van Zyl, expressed commitment to settling the matter amicably but required further discussions to clarify which allegations the Applicant maintained. The Respondent believed some points had already been clarified and sought additional time to resolve outstanding issues before proceeding.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
National Consumer Tribunal Rules
A Tribunal may postpone proceedings to facilitate settlement negotiations between parties, provided procedural requirements are met.
- 02
National Consumer Tribunal Rules
If parties reach settlement, they may apply to have the agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal or file a notice of withdrawal.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal determined that postponing the matter sine die was appropriate to allow the parties to finalize settlement negotiations. Clear procedural directions were provided: if the parties settle and wish the agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application must be filed by 26 July 2019; if they settle but do not wish for an order, a notice of withdrawal must be filed by the same date. Failure to comply will result in the matter being set down for hearing. No order as to costs was made, reflecting the Tribunal's neutral stance pending the outcome of negotiations.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal encourages parties to resolve disputes amicably where possible, in line with the objectives of the National Consumer Tribunal.
- The procedural clarity provided aims to avoid unnecessary delays and ensure efficient resolution of the matter.
Court disposition
The matter is postponed sine die to allow settlement negotiations. Procedural steps for settlement or withdrawal are stipulated, with a deadline of 26 July 2019. No order as to costs.
- The matter is postponed sine die to allow the parties to finalize settlement negotiations.
- If the parties settle and wish the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application must be filed on or before 26 July 2019.
- If the parties settle and do not wish the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, the Applicant must file a notice of withdrawal on or before 26 July 2019.
- If neither an application to confirm the settlement agreement nor a notice of withdrawal is submitted by 26 July 2019, the Registrar will set the matter down for hearing.
- No order is made as to costs.
Source and reliance status
National Consumer Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
National Consumer Tribunal
Order
IN THE NATIONAL CONSUMER
TRIBUNAL
HELD
IN CENTURION
Case number: NCT/78394/2017/57(1)
In the matter between:
NATIONAL
CREDIT
REGULATOR APPLICANT
and
EUGENE
BARNARD
CILLIERS RESPONDENT
Coram:
Prof B Dumisa - Presiding Tribunal Member
Mr A Potwana -
Tribunal Member
Adv J Simpson - Tribunal Member
Date of Hearing - 28 June 2019
POSTPONEMENT
ORDER
1. The Applicant was represented by Ms Rushni Venugopal and Ms Leanne Schwartz, employees of the Applicant.
2. The Respondent was represented by Van Zyl H.C, an Advocate from the Independent Bar.
3. The Applicant informed the National Consumer Tribunal (Tribunal) that before the commencement of the proceedings, the Respondent proposed settlement. The Respondent was agreeable to settlement, provided certain conditions are satisfied.
4. Van Zyl, for the Respondent, submitted that the parties are committed to settling the matter amicably, but the Respondent still needed to have more discussions with the Applicant in order to get clarity on which particular allegations the Applicant still insisted on, as the Respondent was under the impression that they had effectively clarified some of the points where the Applicant had purportedly incorrectly made allegations against the Respondent.
5. The Presiding Tribunal Member informed the parties that they have until the 26th of July 2019 to file an application to confirm the settlement agreement as an order of the Tribunal or a notice of withdrawal.
Failure to do so will result in the matter being set down for hearing.
ORDER
6. It is hereby ordered that:
6.1. The matter is postponed sine die to allow the parties to finalise the settlement negotiations;
6.2. If the parties settle the matter and want the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application should be made on or before 26th of July 2019;
6.3. If the parties settle the matter and do not want the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, the Applicant must file a notice of withdrawal on or before the 26th of July 2019;
6.4. If neither an application to confirm the settlement agreement as an order of the Tribunal or a notice of withdrawal is submitted to the Tribunal by the close of business on 26th of July 2019, the Registrar will set the matter down for hearing; and
6.5. No order is made as to costs.
This done and dated at Centurion on the 26th June of 2019.
(signed)
Prof B Dumisa
Presiding Tribunal Member
Mr A Potwana (Tribunal Member) and Adv J Simpson (Tribunal Member) concurring.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.