Download PDF

South Africa Order

National Consumer Tribunal

National Credit Regulator v Cilliers (NCT/78394/2017/57(1)) [2019] ZANCT 100 (28 June 2019)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal determined that postponing the matter sine die was appropriate to allow the parties to finalize settlement negotiations. Clear procedural directions were provided: if the parties settle and wish the agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application must be filed by 26 July 2019; if they settle but do not wish for an order, a notice of withdrawal must be filed by the same date. Failure to comply will result in the matter being set down for hearing. No order as to costs was made, reflecting the Tribunal's neutral stance pending the outcome of negotiations.

Court disposition

The matter is postponed sine die to allow settlement negotiations. Procedural steps for settlement or withdrawal are stipulated, with a deadline of 26 July 2019. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • The matter is postponed sine die to allow the parties to finalize settlement negotiations.
  • If the parties settle and wish the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application must be filed on or before 26 July 2019.
  • If the parties settle and do not wish the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, the Applicant must file a notice of withdrawal on or before 26 July 2019.
  • If neither an application to confirm the settlement agreement nor a notice of withdrawal is submitted by 26 July 2019, the Registrar will set the matter down for hearing.
  • No order is made as to costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

National Credit Regulator

Applicant Counsel: Ms Rushni Venugopal and Ms Leanne Schwartz

Eugene Barnard Cilliers

Respondent Counsel: Van Zyl H.C

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Application / Postponement Order

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Applicant indicated willingness to settle and agreed to postpone proceedings to allow further negotiations. The Applicant sought clarity on which allegations remained disputed and was open to confirming a settlement agreement as an order of the Tribunal or withdrawing the application, depending on the outcome of negotiations.
Respondent
The Respondent, through Advocate Van Zyl, expressed commitment to settling the matter amicably but required further discussions to clarify which allegations the Applicant maintained. The Respondent believed some points had already been clarified and sought additional time to resolve outstanding issues before proceeding.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    National Consumer Tribunal Rules

    A Tribunal may postpone proceedings to facilitate settlement negotiations between parties, provided procedural requirements are met.

  2. 02

    National Consumer Tribunal Rules

    If parties reach settlement, they may apply to have the agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal or file a notice of withdrawal.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal determined that postponing the matter sine die was appropriate to allow the parties to finalize settlement negotiations. Clear procedural directions were provided: if the parties settle and wish the agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application must be filed by 26 July 2019; if they settle but do not wish for an order, a notice of withdrawal must be filed by the same date. Failure to comply will result in the matter being set down for hearing. No order as to costs was made, reflecting the Tribunal's neutral stance pending the outcome of negotiations.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal encourages parties to resolve disputes amicably where possible, in line with the objectives of the National Consumer Tribunal.
  • The procedural clarity provided aims to avoid unnecessary delays and ensure efficient resolution of the matter.

Court disposition

The matter is postponed sine die to allow settlement negotiations. Procedural steps for settlement or withdrawal are stipulated, with a deadline of 26 July 2019. No order as to costs.

  • The matter is postponed sine die to allow the parties to finalize settlement negotiations.
  • If the parties settle and wish the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application must be filed on or before 26 July 2019.
  • If the parties settle and do not wish the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, the Applicant must file a notice of withdrawal on or before 26 July 2019.
  • If neither an application to confirm the settlement agreement nor a notice of withdrawal is submitted by 26 July 2019, the Registrar will set the matter down for hearing.
  • No order is made as to costs.

Source and reliance status

National Consumer Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

National Consumer Tribunal

Order

[2019] ZANCT 100

IN THE NATIONAL CONSUMER

TRIBUNAL

HELD

IN CENTURION

Case number: NCT/78394/2017/57(1)

In the matter between:

NATIONAL

CREDIT

REGULATOR APPLICANT

and

EUGENE

BARNARD

CILLIERS RESPONDENT

Coram:

Prof B Dumisa - Presiding Tribunal Member

Mr A Potwana -

Tribunal Member

Adv J Simpson - Tribunal Member

Date of Hearing - 28 June 2019

POSTPONEMENT

ORDER

1. The Applicant was represented by Ms Rushni Venugopal and Ms Leanne Schwartz, employees of the Applicant.

2. The Respondent was represented by Van Zyl H.C, an Advocate from the Independent Bar.

3. The Applicant informed the National Consumer Tribunal (Tribunal) that before the commencement of the proceedings, the Respondent proposed settlement. The Respondent was agreeable to settlement, provided certain conditions are satisfied.

4. Van Zyl, for the Respondent, submitted that the parties are committed to settling the matter amicably, but the Respondent still needed to have more discussions with the Applicant in order to get clarity on which particular allegations the Applicant still insisted on, as the Respondent was under the impression that they had effectively clarified some of the points where the Applicant had purportedly incorrectly made allegations against the Respondent.

5. The Presiding Tribunal Member informed the parties that they have until the 26th of July 2019 to file an application to confirm the settlement agreement as an order of the Tribunal or a notice of withdrawal.

Failure to do so will result in the matter being set down for hearing.

ORDER

6. It is hereby ordered that:

6.1. The matter is postponed sine die to allow the parties to finalise the settlement negotiations;

6.2. If the parties settle the matter and want the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, an application should be made on or before 26th of July 2019;

6.3. If the parties settle the matter and do not want the settlement agreement to be made an order of the Tribunal, the Applicant must file a notice of withdrawal on or before the 26th of July 2019;

6.4. If neither an application to confirm the settlement agreement as an order of the Tribunal or a notice of withdrawal is submitted to the Tribunal by the close of business on 26th of July 2019, the Registrar will set the matter down for hearing; and

6.5. No order is made as to costs.

This done and dated at Centurion on the 26th June of 2019.

(signed)

Prof B Dumisa

Presiding Tribunal Member

Mr A Potwana (Tribunal Member) and Adv J Simpson (Tribunal Member) concurring.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

National Consumer Tribunal Rules

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.