National Credit Regulator v DEVCO Auto CC (NCT/213023/2021/140(1)) [2022] ZANCT 23 (27 May 2022)
The Tribunal found, on uncontested evidence, that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations by failing to provide credit agreements in the prescribed form, overcharging interest, imposing prohibited storage fees, including unlawful clauses that avoid statutory obligations, failing to pay annual renewal fees, entering into credit agreements while unregistered, and failing to submit annual financial returns. The respondent's conduct was aggravated by its failure to defend itself after being granted condonation and its non-appearance at the hearing. The Tribunal held that these contraventions amounted to prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the...
- Citation
- [2022] ZANCT 23
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: DEVCO Auto CC
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2022
- Case Number
- NCT/213023/2021/140(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment After Respondent's Non Appearance
- Outcome
- Application granted. The respondent was found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations. Prohibited conduct declared. Administrative fine imposed. Remedial and restitutionary orders granted.
- Judges
- P A Beck, J Simpson, M Peenze
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Fine, Credit Provider Registration, Unlawful Credit Agreements, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
DEVCO Auto CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment After Respondent's Non Appearance
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the respondent repeatedly contravene the National Credit Act and its regulations?
- 2 Did the respondent enter into credit agreements while unregistered as a credit provider?
- 3 Did the respondent overcharge interest and impose prohibited fees on consumers?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on uncontested evidence, that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations by failing to provide credit agreements in the prescribed form, overcharging interest, imposing prohibited storage fees, including unlawful clauses that avoid statutory obligations, failing to pay annual renewal fees, entering into credit agreements while unregistered, and failing to submit annual financial returns. The respondent's conduct was aggravated by its failure to defend itself after being granted condonation and its non-appearance at the hearing. The Tribunal held that these contraventions amounted to prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The respondent was found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations. Prohibited conduct declared. Administrative fine imposed. Remedial and restitutionary orders granted.
Orders
- The respondent is declared to have repeatedly contravened sections 40(1), 40(3), 52(4)(b)(ii), 52(5)(c), 52(5)(f), 90(1), 90(2)(b)(ii), 99(1)(b), 93(2), 100(1)(a), 101(1), 100(1)(c), and 101(1)(d)(ii) of the National Credit Act, relevant regulations, and conditions of registration.
- The respondent's repeated contraventions constitute prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment