National Credit Regulator v Engelbrecht (NCT/243378/2022/140(1)) [2023] ZANCT 12 (1 February 2023)
The Tribunal found, on the uncontested evidence, that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations by operating as an unregistered credit provider, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, charging excessive interest, retaining prohibited consumer instruments, and including unlawful provisions in credit agreements. These actions constituted prohibited conduct under the Act. The Tribunal accepted the Applicant's submissions and evidence, noting the Respondent's absence and lack of defence. The seriousness, duration, and extent of the contraventions, the prejudice suffered by consumers, and the need for deterrence justified the imposition of...
- Citation
- [2023] ZANCT 12
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Jacobus Adriaan Schalk Engelbrecht t/a Sizabantu Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 February 2023
- Case Number
- NCT/243378/2022/140(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Final Judgment After Unopposed Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted. The Respondent is found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and Regulations; prohibited conduct is declared; reckless credit agreements are set aside; administrative fine imposed; further remedial orders granted.
- Judges
- MC Peenze, S Mbhele, Z Ntuli
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Unlawful Credit Agreement, Administrative Fine, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Jacobus Adriaan Schalk Engelbrecht t/a Sizabantu Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Final Judgment After Unopposed Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations, amounting to prohibited conduct.
- 2 Whether the Respondent engaged in reckless lending and failed to conduct proper affordability assessments.
- 3 Whether the Tribunal should impose an administrative fine and other remedial orders against the Respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on the uncontested evidence, that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations by operating as an unregistered credit provider, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, charging excessive interest, retaining prohibited consumer instruments, and including unlawful provisions in credit agreements. These actions constituted prohibited conduct under the Act. The Tribunal accepted the Applicant's submissions and evidence, noting the Respondent's absence and lack of defence. The seriousness, duration, and extent of the contraventions, the prejudice suffered by consumers, and the need for deterrence justified the imposition of...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The Respondent is found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and Regulations; prohibited conduct is declared; reckless credit agreements are set aside; administrative fine imposed; further remedial orders granted.
Orders
- The Respondent is declared to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and Regulations, amounting to prohibited conduct.
- All sampled credit agreements are declared reckless and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment