National Credit Regulator v Fick NO and Another (NCT/99222/2018/140(1)) [2020] ZANCT 17 (28 October 2020)
The Tribunal found that the Respondents, as trustees of the Helmo Trust trading as Intra Finance Cash Loans, repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, failing to keep records of such assessments, and inducing consumers to sign...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] ZANCT 17
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Helena Johanna Maria Fick N.O.; Respondent: Johannes Hendrik Fick N.O.
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2020
- Case Number
- NCT/99222/2018/140(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; Respondents found to have engaged in prohibited conduct and ordered to pay an administrative fine and refund affected consumers.
- Judges
- F Manamela, J Simpson, A Potwana
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Prohibited Conduct
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Helena Johanna Maria Fick N.O.
Respondent
Johannes Hendrik Fick N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations.
- 2 Whether the Respondents failed to conduct proper affordability assessments before granting credit.
- 3 Whether the Respondents induced consumers to sign supplementary agreements resulting in unlawful charges.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondents, as trustees of the Helmo Trust trading as Intra Finance Cash Loans, repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, failing to keep records of such assessments, and inducing consumers to sign supplementary agreements resulting in unlawful charges exceeding the prescribed maximums. The Tribunal dismissed the Respondents' points in limine regarding non-joinder, due administrative process, and jurisdiction, finding that the Applicant had followed proper procedure and that the Tribunal was competent to adjudicate the matter. The Tribunal also rejected the argument that the...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; Respondents found to have engaged in prohibited conduct and ordered to pay an administrative fine and refund affected consumers.
Orders
- The Respondents' repeated contraventions of the National Credit Act and regulations are declared prohibited conduct.
- The Respondents are to pay an administrative fine of R150,000 into the National Revenue Fund within 60 days of the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment