National Credit Regulator V Handri Financial Services CC t/a Bonus Cash (NCT/183475/2021/57(1)) [2021] ZANCT 48 (13 October 2021)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its conditions of registration by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, neglecting to obtain credit bureau reports, misusing bank statements, exaggerating consumers' discretionary income, and failing to retain prescribed records. The Respondent did not contest the allegations, and in terms of Rule 13(5), all facts alleged by the Applicant were deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the Respondent's conduct justified cancellation of its registration as a credit provider, the imposition of an administrative fine, and the appointment of an independent auditor to identify affected...
- Citation
- [2021] ZANCT 48
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Handri Financial Services CC t/a Bonus Cash
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2021
- Case Number
- NCT/183475/2021/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Cancellation Application / Default Judgment After Non Appearance by Respondent
- Outcome
- Application granted. The Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled, an administrative fine is imposed, and further remedial orders are made.
- Judges
- B Dumisa, D Terblanche, T Bailey
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Cancellation of Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Handri Financial Services CC t/a Bonus Cash
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cancellation Application / Default Judgment After Non Appearance by Respondent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its conditions of registration.
- 2 Whether the Respondent failed to conduct proper affordability assessments as required by the Act.
- 3 What is the appropriate sanction for the Respondent's conduct.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its conditions of registration by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, neglecting to obtain credit bureau reports, misusing bank statements, exaggerating consumers' discretionary income, and failing to retain prescribed records. The Respondent did not contest the allegations, and in terms of Rule 13(5), all facts alleged by the Applicant were deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the Respondent's conduct justified cancellation of its registration as a credit provider, the imposition of an administrative fine, and the appointment of an independent auditor to identify affected...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled, an administrative fine is imposed, and further remedial orders are made.
Orders
- The Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled with immediate effect.
- The Respondent must appoint an independent auditor, at its own cost and subject to the Applicant's approval, to identify all consumers affected by reckless lending practices within the past three years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment