National Credit Regulator v HZ Finance (Pty) Ltd (NCT/158481/2020/57(1)) [2022] ZANCT 43 (12 July 2022)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its registration conditions by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, failing to retain prescribed records, charging excessive fees, and engaging in reckless lending. The Respondent's answering affidavit did not provide convincing evidence to rebut the Applicant's allegations, and the Tribunal accepted the Applicant's evidence on a default basis. The Respondent's conduct was declared prohibited, and an administrative fine was imposed. The Tribunal also ordered the appointment of an independent auditor to identify and remedy affected consumers. The cancellation of the Respondent's...
- Citation
- [2022] ZANCT 43
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: HZ Finance (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2022
- Case Number
- NCT/158481/2020/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment After Hearing; Respondent in Liquidation and Absent
- Outcome
- The application is granted. The Respondent is declared to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its registration conditions. An administrative fine is imposed and remedial orders are made.
- Judges
- B Dumisa, D Terblanche, A Potwana
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Credit Provider Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
HZ Finance (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment After Hearing; Respondent in Liquidation and Absent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its registration conditions as a credit provider.
- 2 What is the appropriate sanction for the Respondent's conduct, including administrative fines and remedial orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its registration conditions by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, failing to retain prescribed records, charging excessive fees, and engaging in reckless lending. The Respondent's answering affidavit did not provide convincing evidence to rebut the Applicant's allegations, and the Tribunal accepted the Applicant's evidence on a default basis. The Respondent's conduct was declared prohibited, and an administrative fine was imposed. The Tribunal also ordered the appointment of an independent auditor to identify and remedy affected consumers. The cancellation of the Respondent's...
Court Disposition
The application is granted. The Respondent is declared to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its registration conditions. An administrative fine is imposed and remedial orders are made.
Orders
- The Respondent is declared to have repeatedly contravened specified sections of the National Credit Act and Regulations.
- The Respondent's conduct is declared prohibited in terms of Section 150(a) of the Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment