National Credit Regulator v JOJ Investments Pty Ltd (NCT/183659/2021/140(1)) [2021] ZANCT 42 (30 September 2021)

National Credit Regulator v JOJ Investments Pty Ltd (NCT/183659/2021/140(1)) [2021] ZANCT 42 (30 September 2021)

The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, extending reckless credit, and charging excessive interest and service fees. The Respondent did not oppose the application, and the uncontested evidence established prohibited conduct. The Tribunal declared all sample agreements reckless, set aside consumer obligations under those agreements, and imposed an administrative fine of R75,000.00. The Tribunal also ordered the appointment of an independent auditor to assess all credit agreements since registration, identify overcharged consumers, and ensure reimbursement. The Respondent was interdicted...

Citation
[2021] ZANCT 42
Parties
Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: JOJ Investments Pty Ltd
Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 September 2021
Case Number
NCT/183659/2021/140(1)
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Default Judgment
Outcome
The application is granted. The Respondent is found to have engaged in repeated prohibited conduct, is interdicted from further credit provider activities, must pay an administrative fine, and must appoint an independent auditor to assess and rectify unlawful credit agreements.
Judges
MC Peenze, K Moodaliyar, B Dumisa
Legal Topics
Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Prohibited Conduct, Credit Provider Registration
Banking and Finance Civil Procedure Reckless Lending Affordability Assessment Administrative Fine Prohibited Conduct Credit Provider Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Credit Regulator

Applicant

JOJ Investments Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Administrative Application / Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent engaged in prohibited conduct under the National Credit Act.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent repeatedly contravened the Act and Regulations.
  3. 3 Whether an administrative penalty should be imposed on the Respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, extending reckless credit, and charging excessive interest and service fees. The Respondent did not oppose the application, and the uncontested evidence established prohibited conduct. The Tribunal declared all sample agreements reckless, set aside consumer obligations under those agreements, and imposed an administrative fine of R75,000.00. The Tribunal also ordered the appointment of an independent auditor to assess all credit agreements since registration, identify overcharged consumers, and ensure reimbursement. The Respondent was interdicted...

Court Disposition

The application is granted. The Respondent is found to have engaged in repeated prohibited conduct, is interdicted from further credit provider activities, must pay an administrative fine, and must appoint an independent auditor to assess and rectify unlawful credit agreements.

Orders

  • The Respondent is found to have engaged in repeated prohibited conduct.
  • The Respondent must pay R75,000.00 to the National Revenue Fund within 60 business days.