National Credit Regulator v Khululeka Cash Loans CC (NCT/98951/2018/140(1)) [2018] ZANCT 173 (28 June 2018)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations by entering into credit agreements without conducting proper affordability assessments, granting reckless credit, operating as an unregistered credit provider, and failing to submit annual financial and operational returns. The evidence presented by the Applicant was uncontested, and the Respondent's absence and failure to respond resulted in the allegations being deemed admitted. The Tribunal considered the nature, duration, and gravity of the contraventions, the prejudice to consumers, and the Respondent's disregard for compliance notices. The Tribunal held that these factors...
- Citation
- [2018] ZANCT 173
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Khululeka Cash Loans CC
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2018
- Case Number
- NCT/98951/2018/140(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Default Judgment
- Outcome
- The application is granted. The Respondent is declared to have engaged in prohibited conduct, interdicted from future breaches, and ordered to pay an administrative fine of R100,000.00 by 31 December 2018. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- H Devraj, B Dumisa, K Moodaliyar
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Credit, Affordability Assessment, Credit Provider Registration, Administrative Fine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Khululeka Cash Loans CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent entered into credit agreements without conducting proper affordability assessments.
- 2 Whether the Respondent granted reckless credit in contravention of the National Credit Act.
- 3 Whether the Respondent operated as a credit provider while unregistered.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations by entering into credit agreements without conducting proper affordability assessments, granting reckless credit, operating as an unregistered credit provider, and failing to submit annual financial and operational returns. The evidence presented by the Applicant was uncontested, and the Respondent's absence and failure to respond resulted in the allegations being deemed admitted. The Tribunal considered the nature, duration, and gravity of the contraventions, the prejudice to consumers, and the Respondent's disregard for compliance notices. The Tribunal held that these factors...
Court Disposition
The application is granted. The Respondent is declared to have engaged in prohibited conduct, interdicted from future breaches, and ordered to pay an administrative fine of R100,000.00 by 31 December 2018. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The Respondent's contravention of the provisions of the Act and Regulations is declared prohibited conduct.
- The Respondent is interdicted with immediate effect from future breaches of the Act and Regulations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment