National Credit Regulator v Kutshiyele (NCT/19294/2014/141(1)NCA) [2015] ZANCT 46 (15 December 2015)
The Tribunal found, on uncontested evidence, that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by operating without registration, failing to conduct affordability assessments, not providing required pre-agreement statements and quotations, using unlawful credit agreement provisions, retaining consumers' bank cards and identity documents, and charging excessive interest rates. The respondent's conduct constituted prohibited conduct under the Act. The Tribunal considered the seriousness, duration, and gravity of the contraventions, the vulnerability of affected consumers, the lack of cooperation from the respondent, and the absence of mitigating factors. The Tribunal...
- Citation
- [2015] ZANCT 46
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Akudle Kutshiyele
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2015
- Case Number
- NCT/19294/2014/141(1)NCA
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Final Determination After Hearing; Respondent Absent
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent found in repeated contravention of the National Credit Act and regulations. Administrative fine imposed.
- Judges
- N Sephoti, F Manamela, P Beck
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Credit Granting, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Fine, Consumer Protection, Registration of Credit Providers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Akudle Kutshiyele
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Final Determination After Hearing; Respondent Absent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations.
- 2 Whether the respondent's conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under the Act.
- 3 Whether the contraventions warrant the imposition of an administrative fine and other relief.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on uncontested evidence, that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by operating without registration, failing to conduct affordability assessments, not providing required pre-agreement statements and quotations, using unlawful credit agreement provisions, retaining consumers' bank cards and identity documents, and charging excessive interest rates. The respondent's conduct constituted prohibited conduct under the Act. The Tribunal considered the seriousness, duration, and gravity of the contraventions, the vulnerability of affected consumers, the lack of cooperation from the respondent, and the absence of mitigating factors. The Tribunal...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent found in repeated contravention of the National Credit Act and regulations. Administrative fine imposed.
Orders
- The respondent's repeated contraventions of the National Credit Act and regulations are declared prohibited conduct.
- The respondent is declared to be in repeated contravention of sections 81(1)(a), 81(3), Regulation 55(1)(b)(vi), section 92(1), Regulation 28(1), Regulation 55(1)(b)(iv), section 93, Regulation 30, section 91(b)(i), and section 133 of the Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment