National Credit Regulator v Maoto (NCT/277089/2023/57(1)) [2024] ZANCT 16 (10 July 2024)
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened sections 52(5)(c) of the National Credit Act and her conditions of registration by updating consumer statuses on the Debt Help System without supporting documentation, failing to use a registered Payment Distribution Agency, and failing to maintain adequate records. The respondent's conduct undermined the debt review system and brought the debt counselling profession into disrepute. The Tribunal rejected the respondent's explanations as insufficient and found that her actions constituted prohibited conduct. Given the seriousness and duration of the contraventions, the Tribunal held that cancellation of the respondent's...
- Citation
- [2024] ZANCT 16
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Matea Gladness Maoto
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2024
- Case Number
- NCT/277089/2023/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Opposed Application for Cancellation of Debt Counsellor Registration
- Outcome
- Application granted. The respondent's registration as a debt counsellor is cancelled and an administrative fine imposed.
- Judges
- S Hockey, MC Peenze, P Manzi-Ntshingila
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Debt Counsellor Registration, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Fine, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Matea Gladness Maoto
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Opposed Application for Cancellation of Debt Counsellor Registration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent contravened the National Credit Act and her conditions of registration as a debt counsellor.
- 2 Whether the respondent's registration as a debt counsellor should be cancelled under section 57(1) of the NCA.
- 3 Whether an administrative fine should be imposed for prohibited conduct.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened sections 52(5)(c) of the National Credit Act and her conditions of registration by updating consumer statuses on the Debt Help System without supporting documentation, failing to use a registered Payment Distribution Agency, and failing to maintain adequate records. The respondent's conduct undermined the debt review system and brought the debt counselling profession into disrepute. The Tribunal rejected the respondent's explanations as insufficient and found that her actions constituted prohibited conduct. Given the seriousness and duration of the contraventions, the Tribunal held that cancellation of the respondent's...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The respondent's registration as a debt counsellor is cancelled and an administrative fine imposed.
Orders
- It is declared that the respondent repeatedly contravened sections 52(5)(c) and her conditions of registration 2, 4, 5, 11, and B1.
- The contraventions are declared to be prohibited conduct.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment