National Credit Regulator v Masasa Financial Services and Property Development t/a Masasa Cash Loans (NCT/214109/2021/57(1)) [2022] ZANCT 11 (11 March 2022)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act, its Regulations, and its Conditions of Registration by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, overcharging interest, failing to provide prescribed documentation, including unlawful provisions in credit agreements, and failing to update records and submit required returns. The Respondent did not oppose the application or attend the hearing, and the Applicant's evidence was uncontested. The Tribunal held that these contraventions amounted to prohibited conduct and reckless lending, justifying cancellation of the Respondent's registration and the imposition of an administrative fine of...
- Citation
- [2022] ZANCT 11
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Masasa Financial Services and Property Development t/a Masasa Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2022
- Case Number
- NCT/214109/2021/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Default Judgment After Unopposed Application
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine of R1,000,000 imposed. Credit agreements declared reckless and consumers' obligations set aside. Refunds and corrective actions ordered. Appointment of independent auditor ordered. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- T Woker, K Moodaliyar, T Bailey
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Penalty, Credit Provider Registration, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Masasa Financial Services and Property Development t/a Masasa Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Default Judgment After Unopposed Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the Respondent repeatedly contravene the National Credit Act, its Regulations, and its Conditions of Registration as a credit provider?
- 2 Is the Respondent guilty of prohibited conduct, including reckless lending and overcharging interest?
- 3 Should the Respondent's registration as a credit provider be cancelled and an administrative penalty imposed?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act, its Regulations, and its Conditions of Registration by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, overcharging interest, failing to provide prescribed documentation, including unlawful provisions in credit agreements, and failing to update records and submit required returns. The Respondent did not oppose the application or attend the hearing, and the Applicant's evidence was uncontested. The Tribunal held that these contraventions amounted to prohibited conduct and reckless lending, justifying cancellation of the Respondent's registration and the imposition of an administrative fine of...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine of R1,000,000 imposed. Credit agreements declared reckless and consumers' obligations set aside. Refunds and corrective actions ordered. Appointment of independent auditor ordered. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled with immediate effect.
- The Respondent must pay an administrative fine of R1,000,000 into the National Revenue Fund within 30 days of the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment