National Credit Regulator v Midwicket Trading 525 CC t/a Butterfly Cash Loans (NCT/7962/2013/57(1)) [2014] ZANCT 19 (9 June 2014)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly engaged in prohibited conduct under the National Credit Act, including retaining consumer identity documents and bank cards, failing to conduct affordability assessments, charging interest above the statutory maximum, and failing to submit required annual reports. The Respondent did not dispute these allegations, having failed to file any answering affidavit or appear at the hearing. The Tribunal held that the seriousness and repeated nature of the contraventions justified immediate cancellation of the Respondent's registration as a credit provider. However, given the limited number of agreements assessed and the relatively small excess...
- Citation
- [2014] ZANCT 19
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Midwicket Trading 525 CC t/a Butterfly Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2014
- Case Number
- NCT/7962/2013/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Appear at Hearing.
- Outcome
- The Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled with immediate effect. No administrative fine is imposed. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- T Woker, H Devraj, J Simpson
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Credit Provider Registration, Prohibited Conduct, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Midwicket Trading 525 CC t/a Butterfly Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Appear at Hearing.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent repeatedly engaged in prohibited conduct under the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether the Respondent's registration as a credit provider should be cancelled.
- 3 Whether an administrative fine should be imposed on the Respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly engaged in prohibited conduct under the National Credit Act, including retaining consumer identity documents and bank cards, failing to conduct affordability assessments, charging interest above the statutory maximum, and failing to submit required annual reports. The Respondent did not dispute these allegations, having failed to file any answering affidavit or appear at the hearing. The Tribunal held that the seriousness and repeated nature of the contraventions justified immediate cancellation of the Respondent's registration as a credit provider. However, given the limited number of agreements assessed and the relatively small excess...
Court Disposition
The Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled with immediate effect. No administrative fine is imposed. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The Respondent’s registration as a credit provider is cancelled as of the date of this judgment.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment