National Credit Regulator v Pham Pham Money Lenders (Pty) Ltd Registration Number 2017/068656/07 (NCT/183525/2021/57(1)) [2021] ZANCT 28 (22 September 2021)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, granting reckless credit, charging excessive interest and unlawful fees, and failing to provide pre-agreement statements and quotations. The evidence from the investigation report and sampled consumer files demonstrated ongoing and serious breaches. The Respondent's conduct exploited consumers, caused financial harm, and disregarded statutory obligations. The Tribunal held that cancellation of the Respondent's registration and the imposition of an administrative fine were appropriate remedies to protect consumers and deter similar conduct in the...
- Citation
- [2021] ZANCT 28
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Pham Pham Money Lenders (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2021
- Case Number
- NCT/183525/2021/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Cancellation Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to Appear or File Answering Affidavit.
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Consumer redress ordered.
- Judges
- MC Peenze, T Woker, K Moodaliyar
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Credit Granting, Affordability Assessment, Excessive Interest, Administrative Fine, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Pham Pham Money Lenders (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cancellation Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to Appear or File Answering Affidavit.
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the Respondent repeatedly contravene the National Credit Act and its Regulations?
- 2 Should the Respondent's registration as a credit provider be cancelled?
- 3 Is the imposition of an administrative fine justified?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, granting reckless credit, charging excessive interest and unlawful fees, and failing to provide pre-agreement statements and quotations. The evidence from the investigation report and sampled consumer files demonstrated ongoing and serious breaches. The Respondent's conduct exploited consumers, caused financial harm, and disregarded statutory obligations. The Tribunal held that cancellation of the Respondent's registration and the imposition of an administrative fine were appropriate remedies to protect consumers and deter similar conduct in the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Consumer redress ordered.
Orders
- The Respondent has repeatedly contravened specified provisions of the National Credit Act and Regulations.
- The Respondent's conduct is declared prohibited in terms of Section 150(a) of the Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment