National Credit Regulator v Season Star Trading 333 CC t/a De Noon's Cash Loans (NCT/6977/2012/57(1)(P) NCA) [2013] ZANCT 41 (21 November 2013)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations by failing to use prescribed forms, not fully disclosing costs in pre-agreement statements, charging interest and fees in excess of statutory limits, splitting loans to charge double initiation fees, granting credit to consumers under debt review, charging unlawful NuPay fees, and collecting credit life insurance premiums without actual policies. The Tribunal held that proof of repeated conduct suffices to establish prohibited conduct and that intention is not required. The evidence from sample consumer files was sufficient to demonstrate systemic contraventions. The Tribunal...
- Citation
- [2013] ZANCT 41
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Season Star Trading 333 CC t/a De Noon's Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2013
- Case Number
- NCT/6977/2012/57(1)(P) NCA
- Procedural Posture
- Cancellation Application / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Orders for refund and audit issued.
- Judges
- D Terblanche, N Sephoti, X May
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Credit Provider Registration, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Fine, Consumer Protection, Overcharging of Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Season Star Trading 333 CC t/a De Noon's Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cancellation Application / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations, justifying cancellation of its registration as a credit provider.
- 2 Whether the Respondent failed to use prescribed forms and disclose all costs of credit as required by the Act.
- 3 Whether the Respondent charged interest and fees in excess of statutory limits and split loans to circumvent the Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations by failing to use prescribed forms, not fully disclosing costs in pre-agreement statements, charging interest and fees in excess of statutory limits, splitting loans to charge double initiation fees, granting credit to consumers under debt review, charging unlawful NuPay fees, and collecting credit life insurance premiums without actual policies. The Tribunal held that proof of repeated conduct suffices to establish prohibited conduct and that intention is not required. The evidence from sample consumer files was sufficient to demonstrate systemic contraventions. The Tribunal...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Orders for refund and audit issued.
Orders
- Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled in terms of section 57(1)(a) and (c) of the Act as of the date of this judgment.
- Respondent's conduct is declared to be in contravention of its conditions of registration and prohibited under the Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment