National Credit Regulator v Sewatumong Micro Lending CC t/a Sewatumong Cash Loans (NCT/107809/2018/57(1)) [2018] ZANCT 46 (27 August 2018)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and associated regulations. The evidence showed that the Respondent failed to provide compliant pre-agreement statements and quotations, did not furnish consumers with copies of credit agreements, neglected to conduct proper affordability assessments, entered into reckless credit agreements, charged excessive interest and fees, and unlawfully retained consumer instruments such as SASSA cards and identity documents. The Respondent's conduct was deemed prohibited and severely prejudicial to consumers. The Tribunal held that the requirements for a default judgment were met, as the...
- Citation
- [2018] ZANCT 46
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Sewatumong Micro Lending CC t/a Sewatumong Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2018
- Case Number
- NCT/107809/2018/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment Following Non Appearance by Respondent
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent found in repeated contravention of the National Credit Act and regulations. Registration cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Orders for consumer redress granted.
- Judges
- H Devraj, M Nkomo, K Moodaliyar
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Credit, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Prohibited Conduct, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Sewatumong Micro Lending CC t/a Sewatumong Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment Following Non Appearance by Respondent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and associated regulations.
- 2 Whether the Respondent failed to conduct proper affordability assessments before granting credit.
- 3 Whether the Respondent overcharged consumers on interest and fees beyond statutory limits.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and associated regulations. The evidence showed that the Respondent failed to provide compliant pre-agreement statements and quotations, did not furnish consumers with copies of credit agreements, neglected to conduct proper affordability assessments, entered into reckless credit agreements, charged excessive interest and fees, and unlawfully retained consumer instruments such as SASSA cards and identity documents. The Respondent's conduct was deemed prohibited and severely prejudicial to consumers. The Tribunal held that the requirements for a default judgment were met, as the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent found in repeated contravention of the National Credit Act and regulations. Registration cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Orders for consumer redress granted.
Orders
- The Respondent's contraventions of the Act and Regulations are declared prohibited conduct.
- The Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled with immediate effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment