National Credit Regulator v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd (40475/2010) [2011] ZAGPJHC 153; 2012 (4) SA 47 (GSJ) (25 October 2011)
The court held that neither item 7(2) of Schedule 3 to the National Credit Act nor section 12(2)(c) of the Interpretation Act preserved the statutory cap on administration fees imposed by paragraph 3(b)(i) of the schedule to the Usury Act for pre-existing housing loan agreements. The right to charge administration fees and the corresponding obligation to pay them were acquired by contract under common law, not under the repealed statute. The statutory limitation did not confer any additional right or privilege but merely imposed an overriding restriction, which ceased to apply upon repeal. The determination of administration fees for pre-existing agreements is governed by the terms of the...
- Citation
- [2011] ZAGPJHC 153
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Standard Bank of South Africa Limited
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2011
- Case Number
- 40475/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- JMA Cane
- Legal Topics
- Administration Fee Limitation, Transitional Provisions, Contractual Rights, Statutory Repeal Effects
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Standard Bank of South Africa Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory cap on administration fees under the Usury Act continues to apply to pre-existing housing loan agreements after the Act's repeal by the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether item 7(2) of Schedule 3 to the National Credit Act or section 12(2)(c) of the Interpretation Act preserves the limitation imposed by paragraph 3(b)(i) of the Usury Act.
- 3 Whether the determination of administration fees for pre-existing agreements is subject to statutory or common law constraints.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that neither item 7(2) of Schedule 3 to the National Credit Act nor section 12(2)(c) of the Interpretation Act preserved the statutory cap on administration fees imposed by paragraph 3(b)(i) of the schedule to the Usury Act for pre-existing housing loan agreements. The right to charge administration fees and the corresponding obligation to pay them were acquired by contract under common law, not under the repealed statute. The statutory limitation did not confer any additional right or privilege but merely imposed an overriding restriction, which ceased to apply upon repeal. The determination of administration fees for pre-existing agreements is governed by the terms of the...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs, such costs to include those consequent upon the employment of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment