National Credit Regulator v VICO (Pty) Ltd Trading as Financial Services Cash Loans (NCT/223355/2022/57(1)) [2022] ZANCT 27 (21 June 2022)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened several provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations, including failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, overcharging service fees, failing to provide prescribed documentation, and engaging in reckless lending. The Respondent did not oppose the application or appear at the hearing, and all allegations were deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the Applicant was entitled to the relief sought, including cancellation of the Respondent's registration as a credit provider, declaration of certain credit agreements as reckless, setting aside consumer obligations under those agreements, refund orders,...
- Citation
- [2022] ZANCT 27
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Viico (Pty) Ltd trading as Financial Services Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2022
- Case Number
- NCT/223355/2022/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Appear at Hearing.
- Outcome
- Application granted in substantial part. Respondent found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act. Registration as credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Remedial orders granted for affected consumers.
- Judges
- A Potwana, M Peenze, T Bailey
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Administrative Fine, Credit Provider Registration, Consumer Protection, Default Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Viico (Pty) Ltd trading as Financial Services Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Appear at Hearing.
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the Respondent contravene multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations as alleged by the Applicant?
- 2 Is the Applicant entitled to cancellation of the Respondent's registration, imposition of an administrative fine, and other remedial orders for affected consumers?
- 3 Should the Tribunal grant the Applicant's requested relief, including refund orders and interdicts?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened several provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations, including failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, overcharging service fees, failing to provide prescribed documentation, and engaging in reckless lending. The Respondent did not oppose the application or appear at the hearing, and all allegations were deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the Applicant was entitled to the relief sought, including cancellation of the Respondent's registration as a credit provider, declaration of certain credit agreements as reckless, setting aside consumer obligations under those agreements, refund orders,...
Court Disposition
Application granted in substantial part. Respondent found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act. Registration as credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Remedial orders granted for affected consumers.
Orders
- The Respondent is found guilty of repeatedly contravening specified sections of the National Credit Act and its regulations.
- The Respondent's conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the National Credit Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment