National Credit Regulator v WQ Prime Cash Loans & Trading (Pty) Ltd (NCT/214099/2021/57(1)) [2022] ZANCT 24 (27 May 2022)
The Tribunal found, on the uncontested evidence, that the Respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its Regulations, including failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, granting reckless credit, overcharging interest, failing to provide prescribed documentation, retaining prohibited consumer instruments, and failing to submit required annual returns. The Respondent did not oppose the application or attend the hearing, and thus the Applicant's evidence was accepted as admitted. The Tribunal held that these contraventions were serious, systematic, and placed vulnerable consumers at risk, including those receiving child support grants....
- Citation
- [2022] ZANCT 24
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: WQ Prime Cash Loans & Trading (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2022
- Case Number
- NCT/214099/2021/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Default Judgment After Unopposed Application
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Consumer relief ordered.
- Judges
- K Moodaliyar, T Woker, T Bailey
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Penalty, Credit Provider Registration, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
WQ Prime Cash Loans & Trading (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Default Judgment After Unopposed Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations.
- 2 Whether the Respondent engaged in reckless lending and prohibited conduct.
- 3 Whether the Respondent's registration as a credit provider should be cancelled.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on the uncontested evidence, that the Respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its Regulations, including failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, granting reckless credit, overcharging interest, failing to provide prescribed documentation, retaining prohibited consumer instruments, and failing to submit required annual returns. The Respondent did not oppose the application or attend the hearing, and thus the Applicant's evidence was accepted as admitted. The Tribunal held that these contraventions were serious, systematic, and placed vulnerable consumers at risk, including those receiving child support grants....
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Consumer relief ordered.
Orders
- The Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled with immediate effect.
- The Respondent must pay an administrative fine of R1,000,000.00 into the National Revenue Fund within 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment