National Tertiary Education Fund and Another v Nelson Mandela University (PS 74/17) [2017] ZALCPE 34; [2018] 4 BLLR 392 (LC) (19 December 2017)
The court found that the respondent's notice of termination of the Conditions of Service and Benefits Collective Agreement was unreasonably short and did not comply with section 23(4) of the Labour Relations Act. The agreement had been in force for five years, was of indefinite duration, and affected a large number of employees. The respondent's delay in issuing the notice could not justify a short notice period. The applicant had a clear right to the resolution of disputes pending before the CCMA, and termination of the agreement would render those disputes academic and negatively affect members' rights. The respondent's argument that the applicant was in breach and that termination was...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALCPE 34
- Parties
- Applicant: National Tertiary Education Union; Applicant: National Education, Health and Allied Workers Union; Respondent: Nelson Mandela University
- Court
- Labour Court Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2017
- Case Number
- PS 74/17
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Determination of Urgent Application
- Outcome
- Application granted. The respondent's notice of termination is declared unlawful and of no force and effect. The collective agreement remains in force until reasonable notice is given.
- Judges
- Lallie
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Collective Agreement, Reasonable Notice, Final Interdict, Collective Bargaining, Jurisdiction of Labour Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Tertiary Education Union
Applicant
National Education, Health and Allied Workers Union
Applicant
Nelson Mandela University
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Determination of Urgent Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's notice of termination of the Conditions of Service and Benefits Collective Agreement complied with section 23(4) of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a final interdict preventing the termination of the collective agreement without reasonable notice.
- 3 Whether the respondent's delay or conduct justified the short notice for termination.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent's notice of termination of the Conditions of Service and Benefits Collective Agreement was unreasonably short and did not comply with section 23(4) of the Labour Relations Act. The agreement had been in force for five years, was of indefinite duration, and affected a large number of employees. The respondent's delay in issuing the notice could not justify a short notice period. The applicant had a clear right to the resolution of disputes pending before the CCMA, and termination of the agreement would render those disputes academic and negatively affect members' rights. The respondent's argument that the applicant was in breach and that termination was...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The respondent's notice of termination is declared unlawful and of no force and effect. The collective agreement remains in force until reasonable notice is given.
Orders
- The notice of termination of the Conditions of Service and Benefits Collective Agreement given by the Respondent on 27 November 2017 is in breach of section 23(4) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 and is unlawful and of no force and effect.
- The Conditions of Service and Benefits Collective Agreement and all the Applicant's rights flowing therefrom endure unless and until the Respondent terminates the agreement after giving reasonable notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment