National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa v Wilro Supplies CC and Another (34446/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 1146 (24 June 2015)

National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa v Wilro Supplies CC and Another (34446/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 1146 (24 June 2015)

The court found that the applicant had established that the first respondent was financially distressed and that the requirements for commencing business rescue proceedings under section 131(4)(a) of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008, were met. The court exercised its discretion to place the first respondent under...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] ZAGPPHC 1146
Parties
Applicant: National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa; Respondent: Wilro Supplies CC; Respondent: Companies and Intellectual Property Commission
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
34446/2015
Procedural Posture
Business Rescue Application / Order Granted After Hearing
Outcome
Application granted. The first respondent is placed under supervision and business rescue proceedings are commenced. An interim business rescue practitioner is appointed. Costs are to be costs in the business rescue proceedings.
Legal Topics
Business Rescue, Companies Act 2008, Appointment of Business Rescue Practitioner
Commercial and Corporate Business Rescue Companies Act 2008 Appointment of Business Rescue Practitioner

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa

Applicant

Wilro Supplies CC

Respondent

Companies and Intellectual Property Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Business Rescue Application / Order Granted After Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the first respondent should be placed under supervision and business rescue proceedings commenced in terms of section 131(4)(a) of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008.
  2. 2 Whether an interim business rescue practitioner should be appointed as contemplated by section 131(5) of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008.
  3. 3 How the costs of the application should be allocated in terms of section 135(3) of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established that the first respondent was financially distressed and that the requirements for commencing business rescue proceedings under section 131(4)(a) of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008, were met. The court exercised its discretion to place the first respondent under supervision and commence business rescue proceedings. Furthermore, the court appointed Sandra Beswick as the interim business rescue practitioner in accordance with section 131(5) of the Companies Act. The costs of the application were ordered to be costs in the business rescue proceedings as per section 135(3) of the Act.

Court Disposition

Application granted. The first respondent is placed under supervision and business rescue proceedings are commenced. An interim business rescue practitioner is appointed. Costs are to be costs in the business rescue proceedings.

Orders

  • The first respondent is placed under supervision and business rescue proceedings are commenced in terms of section 131(4)(a) of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008.
  • Sandra Beswick is appointed as the interim business rescue practitioner in respect of the first respondent as contemplated by section 131(5) of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008.