National Union of Mine Workers and Another v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR1779/10) [2014] ZALCJHB 384 (9 October 2014)
The court held that the Commissioner applied his mind to the material facts and arrived at a reasonable decision. The employee, a shop steward who helped formulate the zero-tolerance policy, knowingly breached the rule by entering the workplace after testing positive for alcohol. The Commissioner was not required to determine whether the employee was drunk to the extent of being unable to perform his duties, but rather whether he entered the workplace in breach of the policy. The explanation offered by the employee for entering the premises was rejected, and the Commissioner’s finding that the dismissal was fair was upheld. There was no gross irregularity or unreasonableness in the...
- Citation
- [2014] ZALCJHB 384
- Parties
- Applicant: National Union of Mine Workers; Applicant: Moiloa Bofolo; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner R Dibeng N.O; Respondent: Xstrata Coal SA Goedgevonden
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 October 2014
- Case Number
- JR1779/10
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application to review and set aside the arbitration award is dismissed.
- Judges
- E Molahlehi
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Review of Arbitration Award, Zero Tolerance Policy, Disciplinary Code, Substance Abuse in Workplace
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Union of Mine Workers
Applicant
Moiloa Bofolo
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner R Dibeng N.O
Respondent
Xstrata Coal SA Goedgevonden
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitration award finding the dismissal of the employee to be fair was reviewable on grounds of gross irregularity or unreasonableness.
- 2 Whether the Commissioner correctly applied the zero-tolerance policy regarding alcohol in the workplace.
- 3 Whether the employee's entry into the workplace after testing positive for alcohol constituted a dismissible offence under the disciplinary code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Commissioner applied his mind to the material facts and arrived at a reasonable decision. The employee, a shop steward who helped formulate the zero-tolerance policy, knowingly breached the rule by entering the workplace after testing positive for alcohol. The Commissioner was not required to determine whether the employee was drunk to the extent of being unable to perform his duties, but rather whether he entered the workplace in breach of the policy. The explanation offered by the employee for entering the premises was rejected, and the Commissioner’s finding that the dismissal was fair was upheld. There was no gross irregularity or unreasonableness in the...
Court Disposition
Application to review and set aside the arbitration award is dismissed.
Orders
- The applicants’ application to review the arbitration award made by the Second Respondent under case number MP2918-10 dated 17 June 2010 is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment