National Union of Mineworkers and Another v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JA43/2017) [2017] ZALAC 73; [2018] 3 BLLR 267 (LAC) (28 November 2017)
The Labour Court correctly found that the commissioner failed to resolve irreconcilable factual disputes by not applying the proper technique for evaluating credibility, reliability, and probabilities. The allegation of racial abuse was not put to the employer's witnesses in cross-examination, depriving the commissioner of the opportunity to assess the evidence appropriately. The arbitration award was not one that a reasonable commissioner could reach on the available material, and key issues remained unresolved. Therefore, the Labour Court was justified in setting aside the award and remitting the matter to the CCMA for hearing before another commissioner.
- Citation
- [2017] ZALAC 73
- Parties
- Appellant: National Union of Mineworkers; Appellant: MWACHANDA M.M; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: M Ramotshela N.O.; Respondent: Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2017
- Case Number
- JA43/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Setting Aside Arbitration Award and Remitting Dispute to Ccma.
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Tlaletsi, Ndlovu, Savage
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Review of Arbitration Award, Self Defence in Employment, Cross Examination, Reasonableness Standard
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Union of Mineworkers
Appellant
MWACHANDA M.M
Appellant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
M Ramotshela N.O.
Respondent
Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Setting Aside Arbitration Award and Remitting Dispute to Ccma.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court erred in setting aside the arbitration award and remitting the dispute for re-hearing before another commissioner.
- 2 Whether the commissioner properly resolved irreconcilable factual disputes and applied the correct test for evaluating evidence.
- 3 Whether the allegation of racial abuse was properly put to the employer's witnesses in cross-examination.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court correctly found that the commissioner failed to resolve irreconcilable factual disputes by not applying the proper technique for evaluating credibility, reliability, and probabilities. The allegation of racial abuse was not put to the employer's witnesses in cross-examination, depriving the commissioner of the opportunity to assess the evidence appropriately. The arbitration award was not one that a reasonable commissioner could reach on the available material, and key issues remained unresolved. Therefore, the Labour Court was justified in setting aside the award and remitting the matter to the CCMA for hearing before another commissioner.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment