National Union of Mineworkers and Another v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 1557/2010) [2013] ZALCJHB 191 (12 August 2013)
- Citation
- [2013] ZALCJHB 191
- Status
- Ruling
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Panel
- Boqwana
- Case number
- JR 1557/2010
More details
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Panel
- Boqwana
- Case number
- JR 1557/2010
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the applicants provided a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal, as they only became aware of the judgment on 9 May 2013. The absence of opposition from the respondents was noted. The court was satisfied that there are prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding the denial of legal representation in arbitration proceedings. Accordingly, condonation was granted and leave to appeal was allowed.
Court disposition
Leave to appeal granted.
Orders
- Condonation for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal is granted.
- Leave to appeal is granted.
02
Material facts
Parties
National Union of Mineworkers
Applicant Counsel: E S Makinta AttorneysTaole Elias Mohlasi
Applicant Counsel: E S Makinta AttorneysCommission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
RespondentDiale Simon Ntsoane N.O.
RespondentTwo Rivers Platinum Mine
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Denying Legal Representation in Arbitration Proceedings.
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether condonation should be granted for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal.
- 02
Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding the denial of legal representation.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants argued that they only became aware of the judgment on 9 May 2013 and provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the application for leave to appeal. They submitted that there are prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding the denial of legal representation.
- Respondent
- The respondents did not file any opposing papers and made no submissions in relation to either the condonation application or the application for leave to appeal.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Labour Court practice and case law
Condonation may be granted where the explanation for delay is reasonable and prospects of success exist.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the applicants provided a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal, as they only became aware of the judgment on 9 May 2013. The absence of opposition from the respondents was noted. The court was satisfied that there are prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding the denial of legal representation in arbitration proceedings. Accordingly, condonation was granted and leave to appeal was allowed.
Obiter and limits
- The absence of opposition from the respondents was noted but did not affect the outcome of the condonation application.
Court disposition
Leave to appeal granted.
- Condonation for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal is granted.
- Leave to appeal is granted.
Source and reliance status
Labour Court Johannesburg
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Labour Court Johannesburg
Ruling
REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
JUDGMENT
Case no: JR 1557/2010
In the matter between:
NATIONAL UNION OF
MINEWORKERS .........................................................First Applicant
TAOLE ELIAS MOHLASI ...........................................................................Second Applicant
and
COMMISSION FOR
CONCILIATION
MEDIATION AND
ARBITRATION ................................................................First Respondent
DIALE SIMON NTSOANE N.O. ...............................................................Second Respondent
TWO RIVERS PLATINUM
MINE .................................................................Third Respondent
Decided: In Chambers
Delivered on: 12 August 2013
_______________
JUDGMENT: LEAVE TO
APPEAL
BOQWANA AJ
Introduction
This is an application for leave to appeal part of the Judgment I gave on 23 January 2013 where I found that the commissioner’s ruling denying the applicant legal representation must stand.
The applicant has filed an application for condonation of the late filing of the application for leave to appeal. The respondent filed no opposing papers and made no submissions in relation to both applications.
It appears from the applicants’ papers that they only became aware of the judgment on 09 May 2013. I am satisfied that the explanation given by the applicant is reasonable and am prepared to grant condonation. .
Having considered the application and submissions made on behalf of the applicants I am of the view there are prospects that another Court may come to a different conclusion to the one reached by myself.
I therefore make the following order:
Leave to appeal is granted.
____
Boqwana AJ
ACTING JUDGE OF THE
LABOUR COURT
FOR THE APPLICANTS: E S
MAKINTA ATTORNEYS
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.