National Union Of Mineworkers and Others v Black Mountain Mining (Pty) Ltd (C153/2008) [2009] ZALCCT 8 (2 December 2009)
The court found that the applicants, both shop stewards, were dismissed for misconduct committed during a protected strike, not for participation in the strike itself. The evidence established that Vass was guilty of several serious charges, including making inflammatory and racist statements, intimidating management, and unauthorised absenteeism. Van den Heever was found guilty of intimidation and interference with security staff. The court held that shop stewards, while entitled to certain protections, remain subject to disciplinary control and must conduct themselves responsibly. The dismissals were procedurally fair, with no undue delay or proven bias in the disciplinary process. The...
- Citation
- [2009] ZALCCT 8
- Parties
- Applicant: National Union of Mineworkers; Applicant: John William van den Heever; Applicant: Benjamin Johan Vass; Respondent: Black Mountain Mining (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2009
- Case Number
- C153/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Dismissal Application / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- The dismissal of Van den Heever was substantively unfair but procedurally fair; he is reinstated with limited retrospectivity. The dismissal of Vass was substantively and procedurally fair. Costs awarded to the respondent.
- Judges
- AC Basson
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Strike Related Misconduct, Discipline of Union Representatives, Procedural Fairness, Automatically Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Union of Mineworkers
Applicant
John William van den Heever
Applicant
Benjamin Johan Vass
Applicant
Black Mountain Mining (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Unfair Dismissal Application / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the applicants was substantively and procedurally fair.
- 2 Whether the applicants' dismissals were automatically unfair under section 187(1) of the LRA.
- 3 Whether shop stewards are immune from disciplinary action for misconduct committed during a strike.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, both shop stewards, were dismissed for misconduct committed during a protected strike, not for participation in the strike itself. The evidence established that Vass was guilty of several serious charges, including making inflammatory and racist statements, intimidating management, and unauthorised absenteeism. Van den Heever was found guilty of intimidation and interference with security staff. The court held that shop stewards, while entitled to certain protections, remain subject to disciplinary control and must conduct themselves responsibly. The dismissals were procedurally fair, with no undue delay or proven bias in the disciplinary process. The...
Court Disposition
The dismissal of Van den Heever was substantively unfair but procedurally fair; he is reinstated with limited retrospectivity. The dismissal of Vass was substantively and procedurally fair. Costs awarded to the respondent.
Orders
- The dismissal of the second applicant, Mr. John William van den Heever, was substantively unfair but procedurally fair.
- The respondent is ordered to reinstate the second applicant retrospectively but limited to six months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment