National Union of Mineworkers and Others v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (C449/2004) [2006] ZALC 135 (8 August 2006)
The court found that the condonation application for late filing was defective, lacking sufficient detail regarding the extent of lateness and prospects of success. On the merits, the Commissioner had logically and comprehensively addressed the evidence, including the identification of the truck and driver by Ms Jacobs and the corroborating testimony of Mr Botes. The applicants, except for one loader, failed to testify or provide an innocent explanation, justifying a negative inference. The Commissioner was entitled to conclude that the bricks were unlawfully delivered to an unauthorised address by the driver and his team. The burden of proof was properly considered, and the...
- Citation
- [2006] ZALC 135
- Parties
- Applicant: National Union of Mineworkers; Applicant: Bachebile William Mogorosi & Six Other; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Carmien Ward N.O.; Respondent: Magogong Brickworks (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 August 2006
- Case Number
- C449/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application to Review and Set Aside Arbitration Award Under Section 145 of the Labour Relations Act
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed. Costs awarded against the applicants.
- Judges
- D Nel
- Legal Topics
- Review of Arbitration Award, Condonation of Late Filing, Burden of Proof, Misconduct and Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Union of Mineworkers
Applicant
Bachebile William Mogorosi & Six Other
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner Carmien Ward N.O.
Respondent
Magogong Brickworks (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application to Review and Set Aside Arbitration Award Under Section 145 of the Labour Relations Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitration award issued by the Commissioner should be reviewed and set aside under section 145 of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the condonation application for late filing of the review was adequate and should be granted.
- 3 Whether the Commissioner correctly found the applicants guilty of misconduct and justified their dismissal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the condonation application for late filing was defective, lacking sufficient detail regarding the extent of lateness and prospects of success. On the merits, the Commissioner had logically and comprehensively addressed the evidence, including the identification of the truck and driver by Ms Jacobs and the corroborating testimony of Mr Botes. The applicants, except for one loader, failed to testify or provide an innocent explanation, justifying a negative inference. The Commissioner was entitled to conclude that the bricks were unlawfully delivered to an unauthorised address by the driver and his team. The burden of proof was properly considered, and the...
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed. Costs awarded against the applicants.
Orders
- The application to review and set aside the arbitration award is dismissed.
- The applicants are ordered to pay the third respondent's costs of suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment