Ncanana and Another v Dual Products International (SA) CC and Others (JA150/17) [2019] ZALAC 37; [2019] 11 BLLR 1238 (LAC) (13 June 2019)
The Labour Appeal Court found that the Labour Court failed to properly exercise its discretion in awarding costs against the appellants. The joinder of Mr Koen in the contempt proceedings was not unreasonable, as his conduct was reasonably susceptible to being construed as aiding and abetting non-compliance with the certified award. The Labour Court did not adequately consider the unanswered averments regarding Mr Koen's conduct on specific dates and failed to clarify whether the settlement agreement extended to Mr Koen. The appeal was upheld, and the costs order against the appellants was set aside and replaced with no order as to costs.
- Citation
- [2019] ZALAC 37
- Parties
- Appellant: Musawenkosi Thembani Ncanana; Appellant: National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa; Respondent: Dual Products International (SA) CC; Respondent: Gerry Van Rensburg; Respondent: Stephen Van Rensburg; Respondent: Jaco Koen
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2019
- Case Number
- JA150/17
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Costs Order Following Contempt Application
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; costs order against appellants set aside and replaced with no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Coppin, Murphy, Savage
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Labour Court, Contempt of Court, Joinder of Parties, Unfair Dismissal, Settlement Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Musawenkosi Thembani Ncanana
Appellant
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa
Appellant
Dual Products International (SA) CC
Respondent
Gerry Van Rensburg
Respondent
Stephen Van Rensburg
Respondent
Jaco Koen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Costs Order Following Contempt Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court exercised its discretion judicially in awarding costs against the appellants.
- 2 Whether the joinder of the fourth respondent (Mr Koen) in contempt proceedings was reasonable and justified.
- 3 Whether the settlement agreement extended to all respondents, including Mr Koen.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court found that the Labour Court failed to properly exercise its discretion in awarding costs against the appellants. The joinder of Mr Koen in the contempt proceedings was not unreasonable, as his conduct was reasonably susceptible to being construed as aiding and abetting non-compliance with the certified award. The Labour Court did not adequately consider the unanswered averments regarding Mr Koen's conduct on specific dates and failed to clarify whether the settlement agreement extended to Mr Koen. The appeal was upheld, and the costs order against the appellants was set aside and replaced with no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; costs order against appellants set aside and replaced with no order as to costs.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- The order of the Labour Court that the First and Second Applicants pay the Fourth Respondent's costs is set aside and replaced with: 'There is no order as to costs.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment