Nchoe and Another v Education Labour Relation Council and Others (JR 2214/20) [2024] ZALCJHB 311 (23 July 2024)
The court applied the stringent test under section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, considering whether there was a reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion or whether any compelling reason existed for the appeal to be heard. Upon reflection of the judgment and the submissions made, the court found that the applicant had not demonstrated any reasonable prospect of success nor raised any legitimate dispute on the law or unusual issue deserving the attention of the Labour Appeal Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2024] ZALCJHB 311
- Parties
- Applicant: Philemon Nchoe; Applicant: Itumeleng Medichane; Respondent: Education Labour Relation Council; Respondent: Panelist Paul Phundu; Respondent: Department of Higher Education and Training – Westcol TVET College
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2024
- Case Number
- JR 2214/20
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Review Application
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal dismissed.
- Judges
- Ntsoane
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospect of Success, Superior Courts Act Section 17, Review Application, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philemon Nchoe
Applicant
Itumeleng Medichane
Applicant
Education Labour Relation Council
Respondent
Panelist Paul Phundu
Respondent
Department of Higher Education and Training – Westcol TVET College
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion on the review application.
- 2 Whether any legitimate dispute on the law or unusual issue warrants attention by the Labour Appeal Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court applied the stringent test under section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, considering whether there was a reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion or whether any compelling reason existed for the appeal to be heard. Upon reflection of the judgment and the submissions made, the court found that the applicant had not demonstrated any reasonable prospect of success nor raised any legitimate dispute on the law or unusual issue deserving the attention of the Labour Appeal Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The leave to appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment