NCR v Olanrewaju Emmanuel Ojo T-A Olajos Solutions (NCT-183237-2021-57(1)) [2021] ZANCT 33 (16 September 2021)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and associated Regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, overcharging interest, failing to provide required documentation, and failing to keep proper records. The Respondent's conduct was deemed prohibited and reckless, resulting in financial harm to consumers and bringing the consumer credit industry into disrepute. The Respondent failed to participate in the proceedings or provide a credible defence. The Tribunal determined that cancellation of the Respondent's registration, setting aside of reckless credit agreements, and imposition of an administrative fine were appropriate...
- Citation
- [2021] ZANCT 33
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Olanrewaju Emmanuel Ojo T/A Olajos Solutions
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2021
- Case Number
- NCT-183237-2021-57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Appear at Hearing.
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Credit agreements declared reckless and set aside. Multiple interdicts and compliance orders issued.
- Judges
- D Terblanche, M Peenze, P Beck
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Credit Provider Registration, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Olanrewaju Emmanuel Ojo T/A Olajos Solutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Appear at Hearing.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and associated Regulations.
- 2 Whether the Respondent engaged in prohibited conduct warranting cancellation of registration and imposition of an administrative fine.
- 3 Whether the Respondent's credit agreements with consumers were reckless and should be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and associated Regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, overcharging interest, failing to provide required documentation, and failing to keep proper records. The Respondent's conduct was deemed prohibited and reckless, resulting in financial harm to consumers and bringing the consumer credit industry into disrepute. The Respondent failed to participate in the proceedings or provide a credible defence. The Tribunal determined that cancellation of the Respondent's registration, setting aside of reckless credit agreements, and imposition of an administrative fine were appropriate...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Credit agreements declared reckless and set aside. Multiple interdicts and compliance orders issued.
Orders
- The Respondent has repeatedly contravened specified provisions of the National Credit Act and Regulations.
- The Respondent's conduct is declared prohibited in terms of section 150(a) of the NCA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment