NCR v Zahid Adams t/a SA Credit Solutions (Pty) Ltd (NCT/116600/2018/57(1)) [2021] ZANCT 32 (14 August 2021)
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities and in the absence of credible evidence from the Respondent, that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act, its regulations, and conditions of registration as a debt counsellor. The Respondent failed to obtain proper consent and documentation from consumers, did not refer matters to court or tribunal as required, overcharged fees, and disregarded previous Tribunal orders. These contraventions were serious, ongoing, and prejudicial to consumers, justifying cancellation of the Respondent's registration and the imposition of an administrative fine. The Tribunal dismissed all points in limine raised by the Respondent and...
- Citation
- [2021] ZANCT 32
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Zahid Adams t/a SA Credit Solutions (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2021
- Case Number
- NCT/116600/2018/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Hearing; Application for Cancellation of Registration and Administrative Fine
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a debt counsellor cancelled. Administrative fine imposed.
- Judges
- D. Terblanche, L. Best, M. Peenze
- Legal Topics
- Debt Counsellor Registration, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Fine, Consumer Protection, Failure to Comply With Conditions, Debt Counselling Fee Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Zahid Adams t/a SA Credit Solutions (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Hearing; Application for Cancellation of Registration and Administrative Fine
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act, its regulations, and conditions of registration as a debt counsellor.
- 2 Whether the Respondent's conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under the Act.
- 3 Whether the Respondent's registration as a debt counsellor should be cancelled.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities and in the absence of credible evidence from the Respondent, that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act, its regulations, and conditions of registration as a debt counsellor. The Respondent failed to obtain proper consent and documentation from consumers, did not refer matters to court or tribunal as required, overcharged fees, and disregarded previous Tribunal orders. These contraventions were serious, ongoing, and prejudicial to consumers, justifying cancellation of the Respondent's registration and the imposition of an administrative fine. The Tribunal dismissed all points in limine raised by the Respondent and...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a debt counsellor cancelled. Administrative fine imposed.
Orders
- All points in limine raised by the Respondent are dismissed.
- The Respondent has repeatedly contravened specified sections of the National Credit Act, regulations, and conditions of registration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment