Ndala and Another v Moleele and Others (69254/2011) [2015] ZAGPPHC 92 (13 February 2015)
The court found that the Moleeles had complied with the Deed of Settlement by providing a bank guarantee cheque for R220,000.00 timeously, and that the Deed of Settlement and interim interdict remained operative. The subsequent transfer of the property to the Ndalas was irregular and void, as the Ndalas and their attorney were aware of the prior agreement and court order. The application for eviction by the Ndalas was dismissed, and the transfer in their favour was ordered to be cancelled. The conduct of the Mabuas and Ndalas, while irregular, did not amount to contempt of court as wilfulness and mala fides were not proven beyond reasonable doubt. Costs were awarded against Attorney Ndala...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 92
- Parties
- Applicant: Philemon Ndala; Applicant: Nelly Ndala; Respondent: Michael Lesonya Moleele; Respondent: Shirley Shubi Elsie Moleele; Respondent: John Sebelane Mabua; Respondent: Reshoketswe Emily Mabua; Respondent: City of Tshwane Municipality; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria; Respondent: Conveyancer Nakkie du Toit; Respondent: Attorney AO Ndala
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2015
- Case Number
- 69254/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application in convention dismissed; application in reconvention granted in part; transfer to Ndalas cancelled; costs awarded against Attorney Ndala and respondents in reconvention.
- Judges
- TJ Raulinga
- Legal Topics
- Double Sale, Transfer of Property, Contempt of Court, Setting Aside Transfer, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philemon Ndala
Applicant
Nelly Ndala
Applicant
Michael Lesonya Moleele
Respondent
Shirley Shubi Elsie Moleele
Respondent
John Sebelane Mabua
Respondent
Reshoketswe Emily Mabua
Respondent
City of Tshwane Municipality
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria
Respondent
Conveyancer Nakkie du Toit
Respondent
Attorney AO Ndala
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of Erf 1426, Mabopane Unit U to the Ndalas was valid in light of the prior Deed of Settlement and court order.
- 2 Whether the Moleeles complied with the terms of the Deed of Settlement regarding payment of R220,000.00.
- 3 Whether the subsequent transfer and sale between the Mabuas and Ndalas was irregular and void.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Moleeles had complied with the Deed of Settlement by providing a bank guarantee cheque for R220,000.00 timeously, and that the Deed of Settlement and interim interdict remained operative. The subsequent transfer of the property to the Ndalas was irregular and void, as the Ndalas and their attorney were aware of the prior agreement and court order. The application for eviction by the Ndalas was dismissed, and the transfer in their favour was ordered to be cancelled. The conduct of the Mabuas and Ndalas, while irregular, did not amount to contempt of court as wilfulness and mala fides were not proven beyond reasonable doubt. Costs were awarded against Attorney Ndala...
Court Disposition
Application in convention dismissed; application in reconvention granted in part; transfer to Ndalas cancelled; costs awarded against Attorney Ndala and respondents in reconvention.
Orders
- The application in convention is dismissed as a whole.
- The Deed of Transfer number 00167211 dated January 2011 in respect of Erf 1426 Mabopane-U township in favour of the 1st and 2nd respondents (in reconvention) is cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment