Ndala and Another v Visagie and Another (LCC 70/2009) [2009] ZALCC 3 (28 May 2009)

Ndala and Another v Visagie and Another (LCC 70/2009) [2009] ZALCC 3 (28 May 2009)

The court found that the applicants, as occupiers under ESTA, are entitled to exercise their right to family life in accordance with their culture, specifically by hosting an initiation school on the respondent's farm. This right is protected under section 6(2)(d) of ESTA and sections 30 and 31 of the Constitution. The respondent's objections regarding health, safety, and religion were considered but found not to outweigh the applicants' statutory and constitutional rights, especially as the applicants addressed health concerns and the relief sought was temporary and not permanent. The court emphasized that the rights of occupiers and owners must be balanced, and the order was crafted to...

Citation
[2009] ZALCC 3
Parties
Applicant: Rekie Nellie Ndala; Applicant: Andreas Mahlangu; Respondent: J Visagie; Respondent: Department of Land Affairs
Court
Land Claims Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 May 2009
Case Number
LCC 70/2009
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Interim Relief Before the Land Claims Court
Outcome
Application granted subject to conditions.
Judges
MIA
Legal Topics
Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Right to Family Life, Cultural Rights, Limitation of Owner Rights
Land and Property Constitutional Law Extension of Security of Tenure Act Right to Family Life Cultural Rights Limitation of Owner Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rekie Nellie Ndala

Applicant

Andreas Mahlangu

Applicant

J Visagie

Respondent

Department of Land Affairs

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application for Interim Relief Before the Land Claims Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants, as occupiers under ESTA, are entitled to hold an initiation school on the respondent's farm in accordance with their cultural practices.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's objections based on health, safety, and religious grounds override the applicants' statutory and constitutional rights.
  3. 3 Whether the relief sought unduly limits the landowner's rights under ESTA and the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, as occupiers under ESTA, are entitled to exercise their right to family life in accordance with their culture, specifically by hosting an initiation school on the respondent's farm. This right is protected under section 6(2)(d) of ESTA and sections 30 and 31 of the Constitution. The respondent's objections regarding health, safety, and religion were considered but found not to outweigh the applicants' statutory and constitutional rights, especially as the applicants addressed health concerns and the relief sought was temporary and not permanent. The court emphasized that the rights of occupiers and owners must be balanced, and the order was crafted to...

Court Disposition

Application granted subject to conditions.

Orders

  • The applicants are granted access to portion 6 of the farm Yzervarkfontein 194 IR, Bapsfontein to hold an initiation school from 22 May 2009 to 27 August 2009.
  • A designated area for the school is to be agreed upon by the parties; initiates and teacher must restrict themselves to this area and the family house of the first applicant.