Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Ndalamo Coal (Pty) Ltd v Mbokodo Mining (Pty) Ltd (LM007Apr24) [2024] ZACT 30 (24 June 2024)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger between Ndalamo Coal (Pty) Ltd and Mbokodo Mining (Pty) Ltd does not raise competition concerns and complies with the requirements of the Competition Act. The merger was recommended for approval by the Competition Commission, and no evidence was presented to suggest any adverse effects on competition or public interest. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger and ordered the issuance of a Merger Clearance Certificate.

Court disposition

Merger approved and Merger Clearance Certificate ordered.

Orders

  • The merger between Ndalamo Coal (Pty) Ltd and Mbokodo Mining (Pty) Ltd is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

02

Material facts

Parties

Ndalamo Coal (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Mbokodo Mining (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Application / Final Determination

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant submitted that the merger meets all requirements under the Competition Act and does not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The parties requested approval and issuance of a Merger Clearance Certificate.
Respondent
The respondent did not oppose the merger and concurred with the applicant's submissions regarding compliance with the Competition Act and the absence of competition concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 1998, section 16(2)(a)

    A merger may be approved if it does not substantially prevent or lessen competition, and if it is justified on public interest grounds.

  2. 02

    Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a)

    The Tribunal must issue a Merger Clearance Certificate upon approval of a merger.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger between Ndalamo Coal (Pty) Ltd and Mbokodo Mining (Pty) Ltd does not raise competition concerns and complies with the requirements of the Competition Act. The merger was recommended for approval by the Competition Commission, and no evidence was presented to suggest any adverse effects on competition or public interest. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger and ordered the issuance of a Merger Clearance Certificate.

Court disposition

Merger approved and Merger Clearance Certificate ordered.

  • The merger between Ndalamo Coal (Pty) Ltd and Mbokodo Mining (Pty) Ltd is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2024] ZACT 30

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No.: LM007Apr24

In the matter between: Ndalamo Coal (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring Firm And Mbokodo Mining (Pty) Ltd Primary Target Firm

Panel: M Mazwai (Presiding Member) L Mncube (Tribunal Member) I Valodia (Tribunal Member) Heard on: 21 June 2024 Decided on: 24 June 2024

ORDER

Further to the recommendation of the Competition Commission in terms of section 14A(1)(b) of the Competition Act, 1998 ("the Act") the Competition Tribunal orders that-

1. the merger between the abovementioned parties be approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Act; and

2. a Merger Clearance Certificate be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

Presiding Member 24 June 2024 Ms Mondo Mazwai Date

Concurring: Prof. Liberty Mncube and Prof. lmraan Valodia

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.