Ndudane v Premier of the Eastern Cape & Another (20/2020) [2021] ZAECBHC 39; (2022) 43 ILJ 439 (ECB) (1 June 2021)
The court found that a valid and binding contract of employment was concluded between the applicant and the first respondent when the applicant accepted the written offer of appointment. The applicant's dismissal by her previous employer, DAFF, did not automatically nullify the contract, as the first respondent failed to approach the court to set aside his own decision. The court held that unilateral suspension or revocation of the contract by the first respondent amounted to unlawful self-help, which is impermissible under constitutional principles. The applicant was found to have disclosed her disciplinary status during the interview, and the respondents' version was rejected as...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAECBHC 39
- Parties
- Applicant: Siphokazi Ndudane; Respondent: Premier of the Eastern Cape; Respondent: Member of Executive Council for the Eastern Cape Department of Rural Development and Agrarian Reform
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Bhisho
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 June 2021
- Case Number
- 20/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Hearing on Merits After Opposed Motion Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application granted. The contract between the applicant and first respondent is declared valid and binding.
- Judges
- Maswazi
- Legal Topics
- Public Service Act, Employment Contracts, Disciplinary Proceedings, Self Help Prohibition, Declaratory Relief, Strike Out Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siphokazi Ndudane
Applicant
Premier of the Eastern Cape
Respondent
Member of Executive Council for the Eastern Cape Department of Rural Development and Agrarian Reform
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Hearing on Merits After Opposed Motion Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a valid and binding contract of employment exists between the applicant and the first respondent.
- 2 Whether the applicant disclosed her disciplinary status with her previous employer during the appointment process.
- 3 Whether the applicant's dismissal by her previous employer disqualified her from appointment under the Public Service Act and Regulations.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that a valid and binding contract of employment was concluded between the applicant and the first respondent when the applicant accepted the written offer of appointment. The applicant's dismissal by her previous employer, DAFF, did not automatically nullify the contract, as the first respondent failed to approach the court to set aside his own decision. The court held that unilateral suspension or revocation of the contract by the first respondent amounted to unlawful self-help, which is impermissible under constitutional principles. The applicant was found to have disclosed her disciplinary status during the interview, and the respondents' version was rejected as...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The contract between the applicant and first respondent is declared valid and binding.
Orders
- The application to strike out annexures SNR1, SNR2, SNR3 and SNR4 is dismissed with no order as to costs.
- It is declared that there is a valid and binding contract between the applicant and first respondent concluded on 29 November 2019, appointing the applicant as Head of Department of Rural Development and Agrarian Reform: Eastern Cape.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment