Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Nedbank Ltd / Investec Ltd / Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd and IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd (64/LM/Aug04) [2004] ZACT 70 (28 October 2004)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the merger does not result in a substantial lessening of competition. There is no horizontal overlap between the acquiring firms and the target, and although there is a vertical relationship between IQ and Nedbank, IQ's market share is below 10% and the market is characterized as a buyers' market with multiple competitors. Customers, particularly banks, can easily switch to alternative providers if dissatisfied. No significant public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal agreed with the Commission's recommendation and approved the transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

Merger unconditionally approved.

Orders

  • The merger between Nedbank Ltd, Investec Ltd, Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd and IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Nedbank Ltd

Applicant Counsel: L Mendelsohn

Investec Ltd

Applicant Counsel: J Balkin

Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd

Applicant Counsel: L Mendelsohn

IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • IQ Business Group Market Share: 10

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Large Merger / Merger Clearance

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants argued that the transaction is a recapitalisation of IQ Business Group and does not create any horizontal overlap, as none of the acquiring firms operate in the same market as IQ. They contended that IQ is a small player with less than 10% market share, and the market is highly competitive, allowing customers to easily switch providers.
Respondent
The respondent did not oppose the merger and provided information on its business activities, emphasizing that its services are offered to multiple banks and that customers have the ability to choose among various service providers. The Competition Commission also supported the merger, noting the absence of anti-competitive effects and public interest concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger will not be prohibited unless it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market.

  2. 02

    Competition Commission Report

    The existence of a vertical relationship does not automatically result in anti-competitive effects if the market remains competitive and customers can switch providers.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the merger does not result in a substantial lessening of competition. There is no horizontal overlap between the acquiring firms and the target, and although there is a vertical relationship between IQ and Nedbank, IQ's market share is below 10% and the market is characterized as a buyers' market with multiple competitors. Customers, particularly banks, can easily switch to alternative providers if dissatisfied. No significant public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal agreed with the Commission's recommendation and approved the transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • IQ's process enhancement services have contributed to significant efficiency gains in the banking sector, such as reducing the home loan application process from 30-35 days to 2 days.
  • The Tribunal noted the competitive dynamics in the market, emphasizing the ability of customers to play competitors against each other and the prevalence of short-term service contracts.

Court disposition

Merger unconditionally approved.

  • The merger between Nedbank Ltd, Investec Ltd, Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd and IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2004] ZACT 70

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC

OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case no: 64/LM/Aug04

In The Large Merger Between:

Nedbank Ltd, Investec Ltd, Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd

And

The IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd

Reasons for Decision

Approval

On 27 October 2004 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate approving the transaction between Nedbank Ltd, Investec Ltd, Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd and The IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd. The reasons for this decision follow.

The Parties

The primary acquiring firms are Nedbank Ltd (“Nedbank”), Investec Ltd (“Investec”) and Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd (“HCI”).

Nedbank is ultimately controlled by Old Mutual Plc, a company listed on the London Securities Exchange. No firm controls Old Mutual Plc. Investec is not controlled by any single entity and is listed on the JSE Securities Exchange. Its largest shareholder grouping comprises an empowerment consortium (comprising the Tiso Group, the Peu Investment Group, a broad-based Entrepreneurship Development Trust and an Investec Employee Share Trust), which holds 25,1% of the issued shares of Investec. Sactwu Educational Trust and Southern African Clothing and Textile Workers Union jointly control HCI (11% and 34% respectively).

The primary target firm is The IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd (“IQ”). Pre-acquisition, the primary acquiring firms are shareholders in the target firm.

The transaction

The transaction involves the acquisition of additional shares in the IQ’s share capital by the acquiring firms. This in effect amounts to a recapitalisation of IQ Business Group.

The Parties’ Activities

Nedbank provides banking and related services through out the Republic of South Africa. Investec provides a wide range of financial products and services, viz. investment banking, treasury and specialized finance, private banking and client portfolio management and asset management. HCI is an investment holding company, which invests in the media and broadcasting, gaming, information technology and financial services.

IQ provides project management and process enhancement services including the use of information technology skills and tools to achieve such business process enhancement. IQ designs, implements and manages technology enabled business processes in financial services, healthcare and supply chain management.1

Impact on competition

None of the acquiring firms are involved in the same market as IQ. However, while there is no horizontal overlap in the activities of the parties, IQ and Nedbank are in a vertical relationship as IQ provides services to Nedbank. Along with Nedbank, IQ also provides the following services to other banks: Project management, business analysis, software development and contracting. These services are provided as composite packages of services to their clients.

IQ is, however, a relatively small player as its market share is below 10%. There are a number of other players in the market and according to a competitor of IQ, the service market was a “buyers market in that customers [were] always playing one competitor against the other and service contracts [were] for a short period allowing customers to switch to alternate providers if they were unhappy with services rendered.”2 The Commission in its investigation found that if customers of IQ, the banks in particular, did not wish to source their services from IQ they could switch to other providers of project management services.

Conclusion

Having regard to the above, we conclude that the merger will not lead to a substantial lessening of competition and there are no significant public interest concerns. Accordingly, we agree with the Commission’s recommendation that the transaction be unconditionally approved.

04 November 2004

D Lewis Date

Concurring: N Manoim and M Mokuena

For the merging parties: L Mendelsohn and J Balkin (Edward Nathan & Friedland)

For the Commission: A Chetty (Mergers and Acquisitions)

1 When asked by the tribunal to describe, in layman’s terms, what services IQ provides, Mr Pieter van Tonder, Group Financial Director of the IQ Business Group, replied that in essence IQ simplified business processes by applying technology in order “, to enable businesses to achieve maximisation [of the whole design of the system]”. With regard to the services provided to the banks, IQ, for example, helped simplify the home loan application process (which took about 30-35 days), by developing a system, which reduced the process to 2 days. At page 1-2 of the transcript.

2 At page 5 of the Competition Commission’s report.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.