Nel v Road Accident Fund (13322/03) [2007] ZAGPHC 108 (20 June 2007)

Nel v Road Accident Fund (13322/03) [2007] ZAGPHC 108 (20 June 2007)

The court found that the plaintiff's ambition to become a chartered accountant was not supported by her academic record, family background, or understanding of the profession's requirements. It was more probable that she would have qualified as a bookkeeper and progressed to the level of unqualified accountant, as described in the actuary's basis A scenario. The court accepted the agreed gross prospective value of income having regard to the accident and applied a 25% contingency deduction to the pre-accident income, reflecting the long period and uncertainties involved. The court further held that the plaintiff would likely have discontinued part-time work after advancing in her career...

Citation
[2007] ZAGPHC 108
Parties
Plaintiff: Salomie Nel; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 June 2007
Case Number
13322/03
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for future loss of earnings is upheld in the amount calculated by the court. Defendant is ordered to pay the specified amounts and furnish an undertaking for future medical expenses.
Judges
Murphy
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Loss of Earnings, Future Medical Expenses, Contingency Deductions
Delict Civil Procedure Road Accident Fund Act Loss of Earnings Future Medical Expenses Contingency Deductions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Salomie Nel

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate amount for the plaintiff's future loss of earnings resulting from the accident.
  2. 2 Should the plaintiff's part-time earnings be included in the calculation of future loss of earnings.
  3. 3 What contingency deduction is appropriate given the plaintiff's circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's ambition to become a chartered accountant was not supported by her academic record, family background, or understanding of the profession's requirements. It was more probable that she would have qualified as a bookkeeper and progressed to the level of unqualified accountant, as described in the actuary's basis A scenario. The court accepted the agreed gross prospective value of income having regard to the accident and applied a 25% contingency deduction to the pre-accident income, reflecting the long period and uncertainties involved. The court further held that the plaintiff would likely have discontinued part-time work after advancing in her career...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for future loss of earnings is upheld in the amount calculated by the court. Defendant is ordered to pay the specified amounts and furnish an undertaking for future medical expenses.

Orders

  • The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff R1,427,146 as future loss of earnings.
  • The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff R82,000 as past loss of income.