Nene and Others v S (A129/2010) [2010] ZAGPJHC 147 (23 November 2010)
The court found that the applications for reinstatement of the appeals by Godfrey Nene and Amos Shange did not set out any reasonable prospects of success, and even if this omission were overlooked, the merits of their appeals were without substance. The evidence against them was overwhelming, with firearms and ammunition found concealed in the house occupied by Nene, and neither appellant provided credible testimony or mitigation. The appeals against sentence by the remaining appellants were also dismissed, as the sentences imposed were already lenient in light of the seriousness of the offences and the statutory minimum sentences. The magistrate had properly considered the personal...
- Citation
- [2010] ZAGPJHC 147
- Parties
- Appellant: Themba Godfrey Nene; Appellant: Amos Shange; Appellant: Bongani Makhoba; Appellant: Sylvester Mosetsi; Appellant: Livingstone Mncube; Appellant: Stephen Ramagaga; Respondent: The State
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2010
- Case Number
- A129/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Reinstatement of Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Applications for reinstatement of appeals by Godfrey Nene and Amos Shange dismissed; appeals against sentence by Bongani Makhoba, Sylvester Mosetsi, Livingstone Mncube and Stephen Ramagaga dismissed.
- Judges
- Willis, Hoffman
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Possession of Firearms, Unlawful Possession of Ammunition, Minimum Sentencing, Appeal Reinstatement, Mitigation of Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Themba Godfrey Nene
Appellant
Amos Shange
Appellant
Bongani Makhoba
Appellant
Sylvester Mosetsi
Appellant
Livingstone Mncube
Appellant
Stephen Ramagaga
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Reinstatement of Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applications for reinstatement of the appeals of Godfrey Nene and Amos Shange should be granted.
- 2 Whether the appeals against sentence by Bongani Makhoba, Sylvester Mosetsi, Livingstone Mncube and Stephen Ramagaga should succeed.
- 3 Whether the sentences imposed were appropriate given the seriousness of the offences and the circumstances of the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applications for reinstatement of the appeals by Godfrey Nene and Amos Shange did not set out any reasonable prospects of success, and even if this omission were overlooked, the merits of their appeals were without substance. The evidence against them was overwhelming, with firearms and ammunition found concealed in the house occupied by Nene, and neither appellant provided credible testimony or mitigation. The appeals against sentence by the remaining appellants were also dismissed, as the sentences imposed were already lenient in light of the seriousness of the offences and the statutory minimum sentences. The magistrate had properly considered the personal...
Court Disposition
Applications for reinstatement of appeals by Godfrey Nene and Amos Shange dismissed; appeals against sentence by Bongani Makhoba, Sylvester Mosetsi, Livingstone Mncube and Stephen Ramagaga dismissed.
Orders
- The applications for the appeals of Godfrey Nene and Amos Shange to be reinstated are dismissed.
- The appeals of Bongani Makhoba, Sylvester Mosetsi, Livingstone Mncube and Stephen Ramagaga against sentence are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment